[mpls] Closed: working adoption poll on g draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 10 August 2016 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BCB12D505; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltqW-7FUAvbE; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DF012D60B; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B400A18015A1; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:36:56 +0200 (CEST)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <3beaf5e5-db43-e8e6-f24b-c75e23d467f2@pi.nu> <135ca945-b8f2-484c-0b0f-4a74cca5533e@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <7a18ceef-0464-05ff-4925-b2849d9759ed@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:36:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <135ca945-b8f2-484c-0b0f-4a74cca5533e@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/aiG3enf8cDb38tRLrSsu4SC_7lA>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org" <draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Closed: working adoption poll on g draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:37:00 -0000

Working Group,

This working groups adoption poll (wgap) is now closed and we have a
new working group document.

Can the authors please post a new version:

draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-00

With no other changes than fielname, version number and dates, compared 
to the document that was polled.

/Loa
mpls wg co-chair

On 2016-08-01 12:07, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The response to this adoption poll has been a bit low, I assume this
> depends on that this depends on that it was done across the IETF
> meeting in Berlin and was kind of drowned in the mail flood around
> the meeting.
>
> The poll has been extended to August 9 hoping that we will see further
> responses.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2016-07-19 11:21, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-chandra-mpls-ri-
>> rsvp-frr as a MPLS working group document.
>>
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
>> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>>
>> There is one IPR disclosure against either document..
>>
>> All the authors have stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
>> unaware of any other IPRs that those that has been disclosed
>>
>> The MPLS-RT review had some comments about the relationship between
>> this document and draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte. The authors
>> of draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte has told the wg chairs that
>> their draft is almost ready for working group adoption. It seems, given
>> that one or both documents are accepted as wg denouements, that these
>> issues are more efficiently resolved during working document process.
>>
>> The working group adoption poll ends August 2, 2016.
>>
>> /Loa
>> mpls wg co-chair