[mpls] Closed: working adoption poll on g draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group,

This working groups adoption poll (wgap) is now closed and we have a
new working group document.

Can the authors please post a new version:

draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-00

With no other changes than fielname, version number and dates, compared 
to the document that was polled.

/Loa
mpls wg co-chair

On 2016-08-01 12:07, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The response to this adoption poll has been a bit low, I assume this
> depends on that this depends on that it was done across the IETF
> meeting in Berlin and was kind of drowned in the mail flood around
> the meeting.
>
> The poll has been extended to August 9 hoping that we will see further
> responses.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2016-07-19 11:21, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>
>> Working Group,
>>
>> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-chandra-mpls-ri-
>> rsvp-frr as a MPLS working group document.
>>
>> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
>> group mailing list ([e-mail]) Please give a technical
>> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
>> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>>
>> There is one IPR disclosure against either document..
>>
>> All the authors have stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
>> unaware of any other IPRs that those that has been disclosed
>>
>> The MPLS-RT review had some comments about the relationship between
>> this document and draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte. The authors
>> of draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte has told the wg chairs that
>> their draft is almost ready for working group adoption. It seems, given
>> that one or both documents are accepted as wg denouements, that these
>> issues are more efficiently resolved during working document process.
>>
>> The working group adoption poll ends August 2, 2016.
>>
>> /Loa
>> mpls wg co-chair