Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sun, 12 May 2013 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E0521F85D6 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f75PtGAJDQEf for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7824121F85CE for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3755; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368390482; x=1369600082; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=BqjDedA4Evn5TgT70yDMwfP4a6z//V6huzL6wQyhAjc=; b=QjRAM41chBNx9agUoYjGW0MBJl/EwKRGL73kWGSG4mWVJfgzQFbU3Eqa 3MR0+aSTqNsKJZ+IqBpXvEWIPJZFXMBcDL0f3KicEVoRRLeRnhW5guWNn IZU2YOAc1ssCT4sZpXLHMJaQuTAFeSPUQ46vv0xDPvfWL8CMVkaB2i0+q A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAAb6j1GtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwc3wCeBAxZ0gh8BAQEDAQEBATctBwsMBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBycLFAkIAgQOBQgBh30GDLsZjnUCMQcGgm5hA5hSkA+DD4In
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,657,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="206516789"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2013 20:28:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4CKS1T6031822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 12 May 2013 20:28:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.192]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:28:01 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
Thread-Index: AQHOT08y6w2F43NGUEaFNASPNIw/zg==
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:28:00 +0000
Message-ID: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED322B44332@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CDB28894.268F1%nitinb@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CDB28894.268F1%nitinb@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.115.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <34618218CD126346BBE291930B009BB6@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:28:07 -0000

+1.

Thanks,

-- Carlos.

On May 10, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> wrote:

> 
> Fully support the ID. I was never a fan of ACH TLVs.
> 
> Thanks
> Nitin Bahadur
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/7/13 10:08 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> ACH TLVs keep popping up and causing Stewart and me trouble. Mainly it is
>> about explaining why no-one actually wants to use them (i.e., when each
>> new ACH Type is defined and has a "No TLVs" written for it, we get asked
>> "why not?").
>> 
>> It seems to us that ACH TLVs are an idea that has been rejected.
>> Initially we thought they might be used (especially for identifiers), but
>> there seems to be good opinion that handling generic TLVs would be a pain.
>> 
>> Since I was heavily responsible for insisting that ACH TLVs were included
>> in RFC 5586, it seems reasonable that I do the work to fix it.
>> 
>> The I-D below retires ACH TLVs and handles the necessary registry changes.
>> 
>> Note, of course, that structured data are still possible within
>> individual ACHs if the protocol spec for an individual ACH decides to
>> have them.
>> 
>> We're directing this work to the MPLS working group because that is where
>> 5586 was written. I have BCC'ed PWE3, L2VPN, and BFD for information.
>> 
>> Thanks for any comments.
>> 
>> As humble WG contributors we would be enthusiastic to see early WG
>> adoption and last call :-)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>>> Sent: 07 May 2013 17:33
>>> To: Adrian Farrel; Stewart Bryant
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>> draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-
>>> 00.txt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Filename:	 draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv
>>> Revision:	 00
>>> Title:		 Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS
>>> Generic Associated Channel
>>> Creation date:	 2013-05-07
>>> Group:		 Individual Submission
>>> Number of pages: 4
>>> URL:            
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-
>>> ach-tlv-00.txt
>>> Status:         
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv
>>> Htmlized:       
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>   The MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) is a generalization of
>>>   the applicability of the Pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel Header
>>>   (ACH).  RFC 5586 defines the concept of Type-Length-Variable (TLV)
>>>   constructs that can be carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing
>>>   them in the ACH.
>>> 
>>>   No Associated Channel Type yet defined uses a TLV.  Furthermore, it
>>>   is believed that handling TLVs in hardware introduces significant
>>>   problems to the fast-path, and since G-ACh messages are intended to
>>>   be processed substantially in hardware, the use of TLVs in
>>>   undesirable.
>>> 
>>>   This document updates RFC 5586 by retiring ACH TLVs and removing the
>>>   associated registry.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>