Re: [mpls] draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-01 - Updating the LSP Ping IANA registries

Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90E0120122; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zEtJ2EGxEO0t; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338921200FB; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id k13so4360135qtm.12; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=02k14rBuxfyBWw6csScuZk+lQtPyM4uStaIyf51630c=; b=gzaxpPSU6kGpwZFif+3V+IIcS3PsvsFZsf9/8uLjO35vk1DcTzhGgDuyI5geej74Fr SycMeweTtlvKuSkivAADYVQOWQdO65ZxD7AQBmGmONAT0rsX8r+ufQtXPh3efG1NDPs4 QSOugc4pQluYyAUxNgrxsKar1Hdr+M3yx3FCZJBPpZ8qaAtxbHoW33Rrnvsg2r03+TaN 0pK84LX4jnMtfy11hs2OE1DWZbtI/rT9wRC8djyQogXcDZlMxhi5XIOoM0t4R5IHIQIA y7ttvorsP6vJnGVghYOiAu2pn1hpzKm+B9+CMODzN0zxkC7MVGbAeuF53tAUQEDgv9th qcpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=02k14rBuxfyBWw6csScuZk+lQtPyM4uStaIyf51630c=; b=BBlFiAckgrDyNx5eOrth99aRtBqIJL5fG1zyMKFYyNXI9jviHx3orIT/WViCrihjn6 Y8+HJsHn5XysEd8d2/ZMp/SHtzZ0023tjsLB+A3J8wLzFykG8Wp2UJWFXtfZXdIwRGfT s+4goboNhf4nRkoIQ+bRlsBz2nOMm17rGJ5cJDanKV7YFKpmLOwC/rffhnJxKpZ1toZs c5SXeYbqsndy7lfplTEcZWNl8Clv5qN2d9YKSGF/p1NxKdGRfB3nE04OK1ZWHN90WIBI bVhx8kEv5yp9yXl+kzAYE02eje5NSot0gb3i6mB+VwVJjio1bLC1P30yxsP+Yric2FZJ vPvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGdLXC6ek9NZfwEsSIjSOPJTr9TAYJPsWqFFtR2eFVg/KzzB1i /t5B2eTo099cnT0elulPQhLGqlB7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyI4VAHsP/pMSQMV6ZcoekZKxf30Vpkc+e79uyktRiiet04+lsiqPB6/9b5NQkQ+QHB0c/klA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:12ad:: with SMTP id w13mr3408272qvu.172.1566270150049; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-cpignata-nitro3.cisco.com ([173.38.117.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i12sm7389242qki.122.2019.08.19.20.02.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_81BABBC0-ED44-4739-B8CD-4BF66BE74BA7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <027301d55423$d3269f90$7973deb0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 23:02:28 -0400
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 587962948.395714-103f2a10897cd300a1ed2574dc3197b9
Message-Id: <ABA58946-B1A2-44B4-9B08-FD9CF750BBD9@gmail.com>
References: <21011742-C1D6-4F64-852A-4C399139B840@gmail.com> <cda5c3c8-5e9e-21ba-6062-fc00a841e52b@pi.nu> <027301d55423$d3269f90$7973deb0$@olddog.co.uk>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ax7tgtwBLR96oqo_nNprwDKwlyo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-01 - Updating the LSP Ping IANA registries
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:02:34 -0000

Hi, Adrian, Loa,

In this new proposed text:
>    RFC 8126 [RFC8126] updated the LSP Ping IANA registries to match
>    RFC 8029, but there were still some ambiguities, that were
>    reflected in the registries.


Should RFC 8126 be instead RFC 8611?

If so, then:
1. RFC 8126 could stay as it was.
2. RFC 8611 should be Normative (given the new text from Adrian, on RFC 8611 and not 8126).

Thanks!

—
Carlos Pignataro, http://carlos.pignataro.net <http://carlos.pignataro.net/>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

> On Aug 16, 2019, at 7:14 AM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; wrote:
> 
> Yeah,
> 
> I think that Carlos was right in the context of the text he reviewed, but with my change the reference should stay normative.
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>; 
> Sent: 16 August 2019 12:11
> To: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>;
> Cc: draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>;; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>;
> Subject: Re: draft-andersson-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-01 - Updating the LSP Ping IANA registries
> 
> Folks, (adding Adrian as Shepherd),
> 
> It has take me a long tiime to start updating the draft according to the
> much appreciated comments from Carlos and Adrian.
> 
> I have a question on one of the comments from Carlos:
> 
> On 2019-08-06 22:14, Carlos Pignataro wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>    [RFC8611]  Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Litkowski, S., Decraene, B.,
>>               Drake, J., and M. Chen, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping
>>               and Traceroute Multipath Support for Link Aggregation
>>               Group (LAG) Interfaces", RFC 8611, DOI 10.17487/RFC8611,
>>               June 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8611>;.
>> 
>> 
>> CMP: This should be Informative.
> 
> Adrain comment on updating RFC 8611 (his suggested text for Section 1):
> 
> NEW
>    When RFC 8029 [RFC8029] where published it contained among other
>    things updates to the "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
>    Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" IANA name space
>    [IANA-LSP-PING].
> 
>    RFC 8126 [RFC8126] updated the LSP Ping IANA registries to match
>    RFC 8029, but there were still some ambiguities, that were
>    reflected in the registries.
> 
>    This document updates [RFC8029] and [RFC8126] by updating two
>    groups of registries.
> END
> 
> So we are updating RFC 8611, and the text that we add/change will be
> normative, does thai not make RFC 8611 a normative refrenece?
> 
> /Loa
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>