[mpls] Review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B92B12B074; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.508
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0VdMJ40qpd6J; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB41D12B00B; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 01:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id COU72371; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:51:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA416-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:51:37 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by SZXEMA416-HUB.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:51:33 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis.all@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis
Thread-Index: AQHR7WQ828WVAmMkVESI2mJqSnMeMQ==
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:51:32 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE28E782AA6@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <041801d1ecdb$317d1910$94774b30$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <041801d1ecdb$317d1910$94774b30$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.57A1B0A6.00B5, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 400f431c97c92998ff5d9c6cf333c339
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/b5gpfZtphXChv2xCCzg1yVr74Yk>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc3107bis
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 08:51:55 -0000

Hi all,

I have done my MPLS-RT review of draft-rosen-mpls-rfc307bis-00. 

The draft is coherent and useful, it's ready for WG adoption.

The draft is well written and I have only one comment regarding to Section 5. IMHO, although it's informational, the description about the relationship between SAFI-1 and SAFI-4 routes should not belong to this document, it's a more common description that is not specific to this label binding process. I'd suggest to remove this section if there is no any other reasons.

Best regards,