IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 13 March 2019 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9582130EDB; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-k-AAHAY3Nk; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7DB8130ED0; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DC0B7CB42607FEFC9370; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:15:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:15:13 +0000
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.190]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:15:09 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "loa@pi.nu" <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU2Oy6s520bV8QO0y5RWWbir7qHKYJRALQ
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:15:08 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE2928FAF0D@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <155240641959.16274.10292530156982066442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155240641959.16274.10292530156982066442.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.194.201]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bAOR9DQZqK16OtSCo-tv8hsOLJA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:15:19 -0000

Hi Mirja,

Thanks for your comments!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:00 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org;
> loa@pi.nu; mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-
> multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I wanted to comment on the same sentence/normative requirement as
> Alvaro did in his point (2). Given Alvaro's additional information that there is
> actually even a technical conflict with this requirement, I think this should be
> address before publication and might even be discuss-worthy. However, I'm
> really not an expert on MPLS and therefore leave the decision to state a
> discuss ballot position to potentially other, more knowledgable ADs.
> 
> Thanks for addressing the TSV-ART review comments (and thanks Jörg for
> the review)! I support adding another sentence with a pointer to rate-limit
> requirements in other docs. Thanks for proposing this change. Looking
> forward this see this in the doc!

Are you suggesting to add a reference, do you have any specific docs suggestion?

Best regards,
Mach 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email