Re: [mpls] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: (with COMMENT)

[Mach Chen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja,

Thanks for your comments!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:00 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-
> multipath-06: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-06: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I wanted to comment on the same sentence/normative requirement as
> Alvaro did in his point (2). Given Alvaro's additional information that there is
> actually even a technical conflict with this requirement, I think this should be
> address before publication and might even be discuss-worthy. However, I'm
> really not an expert on MPLS and therefore leave the decision to state a
> discuss ballot position to potentially other, more knowledgable ADs.
> 
> Thanks for addressing the TSV-ART review comments (and thanks Jörg for
> the review)! I support adding another sentence with a pointer to rate-limit
> requirements in other docs. Thanks for proposing this change. Looking
> forward this see this in the doc!

Are you suggesting to add a reference, do you have any specific docs suggestion?

Best regards,
Mach 
>