IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 09 October 2024 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0979C14F6FB; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEbuUroY0ltX; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90092C14F6EA; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XNfds711Sz6K992; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:13:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.67]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9DD140447; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:14:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemf500007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.81) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 05:14:09 +0100
Received: from kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.220) by dggpemf500007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:14:07 +0800
Received: from kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.220]) by kwepemf100006.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.220]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:14:07 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "N.Leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
Thread-Index: AdsUCH2u/fcejgBNTzioCtsPGij2jv//5u+A//P37fA=
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 04:14:07 +0000
Message-ID: <3215d88e87ec4f25b5edad2f138e63b1@huawei.com>
References: <BEZP281MB20085D267CFABD1474A4771898772@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CA+RyBmV+mErkBGqn=APs_Reuz+aG1=00H0ZehMbCdgj-RUAgMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmV+mErkBGqn=APs_Reuz+aG1=00H0ZehMbCdgj-RUAgMw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3215d88e87ec4f25b5edad2f138e63b1huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: PYRQECYI5L7AFJIOFOBK7HL7TPMMUSXJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: PYRQECYI5L7AFJIOFOBK7HL7TPMMUSXJ
X-MailFrom: jie.dong@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org" <draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bJNqba6BRN5-mnvbiMyNxCr6bS0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Just realized that I should also reply to this thread…

As being discussed in another thread about MPLS entropy, there are already several mechanisms for providing entropy in MPLS, and they have been deployed in production networks.

Without explicit requirements from operators, it seems providing yet another option for MPLS entropy is not beneficial.

Thus I do not support the adoption of this draft.

-Jie

From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:18 AM
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

The draft offers a practical use of MNA. The drafts is well-written and is very clear on the proposed mechanism. I support the adoption of the draft by the MPLS WG.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 7:05 AM <N.Leymann@telekom.de<mailto:N.Leymann@telekom.de>> wrote:
Dear WG,

This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy as a MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document
should not be adopted as a working group document.

Currently, there are no IPR disclosure against this document. All the authors/contributors have stated on
the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this document.

This working group adoption poll ends October 16, 2024.

Regards,

Nic (as MPLS WG co-chair)
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status