IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com> Fri, 29 April 2016 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F107B12D54B; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NuUTU7WzncgG; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE8312D51A; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k142so132003581oib.1; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gq46MYXaUIoHE+JF8BDaL2evzmY/3Lv7Kgruozrc5Vg=; b=x9ITxaGH003yDPejNvRKfccKX4R7qyYk/uz3BLugfS2EDEKOQVnHJtqcjWK7PzfkdC PFb+9bAZmXhsLWrOrnFXWHouvZW5jU87VpL+bIQ8CoYqUM1qrBMMo9EX+pHKxsOxNTdg K7sReclLLXQdsUwgoFSx9U0uM59Y0y/UGjFptbMBFefIZpmbbgSsUsud+ldi9vcbLPEZ zZLp628wwAqD4Uksu8B0jC4ro3zjzB22hBxydj0yv5S2jeX3rIvHtBt3UbFajE0CT/tX JMv+IgZvoAcZq2q6ptH7BPH80GR8QqI/BWaGPCnih9N3ooebw7+1/6G5f0tUAGq7lnPg As9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gq46MYXaUIoHE+JF8BDaL2evzmY/3Lv7Kgruozrc5Vg=; b=liNukv8bQLaeWuA+TU/SvFgRw6CJ04L2rLjUZbEdCb6TSwdWXgsZ8YVsuVAwg0cZPm a7vTh4/3s1j4CxPmQt4DMD+TkOKoeBzGTRJxtbftQ1qfedqpUXgL3J9A/tfmu3hna/Ro EFmYGIazNz6bUEKXmPLXALZiQ+d+jZ2qks7hSWyIx3z09V1IUEA1mkyhntdMfjiDg9fb GfgQN9fz0TAPasehJvw9I/dc1PbHllOjs7biWHkVv+V3VCRpNjHeNxTBn08nNfArEYcA bEGCx2oYDIxUqs0YnZ4n1Z0UAiVzaUoIhgS4ySVMV4FLU6GPMX1Nf90nehtF1i2IFkLr cVIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUL5SvK/Plx+iQhjhYhflkU6xcjNyEH7CElqXPo0SdvZ/WRlBMBDDZtDxcUDpCQfigDdZVFSgeyDsWhpg==
X-Received: by 10.157.41.162 with SMTP id n31mr10764603otb.62.1461962507264; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.223.213 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <571E69F2.8020506@gmail.com>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu> <571E229B.2090405@gmail.com> <CAAA2pyd55Unb55tgzZ1G1C1RRDXkGYgWSf8qctfnM6=qUBkp6g@mail.gmail.com> <571E69F2.8020506@gmail.com>
From: Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:41:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOndX-s3hu3wGoN5eFWfjjmXTExn60L_5+rErzHLMaCgLTuozw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113df6c2ebaa120531a5abe3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bN8T_2Ep30tkdGIVGZO780G29Os>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:41:50 -0000

Hi Stewart,

Pls see inline.



On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 25/04/2016 18:57, George Swallow wrote:
>
> Stewart -
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stewart Bryant <
> <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I support this becoming a WG doc and thereby comming under WG
>> control.
>>
>
> The document is a WG doc.   We are now in WG last call.
>
>
> Sorry, I missed that :( I should have read the subject!
>
>
>
>> However I am not sure about the dismissal of the option to reuse
>> the ELI+EL. This clutters the stack less than the proposed option.
>>
>> Also I wonder why this is standards track?
>>
>
> A reasonable question, particularly since there are no MUSTs, SHALLs or
> REQUIREDs.  Will discuss with my Co-Chairs and ADs.
>
>
> Well that brings me to wonder what needs to be specified, since action
> when the label stack is pushed is a local matter and as I remember a number
> of the rejected strategies are just normal MPLS.
>

Sri> Just re-iterating a response to a similar point in an earlier email -
 "Since there are different ways to do this and some ways are better than
others, this draft lists the different options and recommends one solution."


> - Stewart
>
>
Thanks
Sri


>
>
>
>> Surely any equipment that understands the ELI can do this and thus this
>> is just an informal description of the problem and a solution.
>>
>> Stewart
>>
>>
>> On 23/04/2016 08:53, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label.
>>>
>>> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
>>>
>>> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>>>
>>> All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
>>> the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
>>> IPRs that relates to this draft.
>>>
>>> This working group last call ends May 12, 2016.
>>>
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>> for the MPLS wg chairs
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status