Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 26 February 2019 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951C7130E91; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:26:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4YAh51dWTzO; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B02130E8C; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:26:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8126; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1551169567; x=1552379167; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uzsBfIV17H0SXnFHx4MF/29PhKnI/OkElNdoxE+LgTs=; b=i+94ugjCZ05CeeLN9oB8D2GqpqWuDO7BEMWp9YK6c0EoLY5bwNVWAllz L471mxjV/NDlvFjyEAzeTnY119kU6vBAhxObc14M1+nZmPoKatgp+0a3W uk+ilR6+7KiYl9aNC56juL9K0rADHZdu1s16XLBh6PeDHPuW6xN6D+cSs M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAACm93Rc/5NdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwMBAQEBCwGBDXaBaicKg36oL4VxFIFnCwEBhGwCF4N5IjYHDQEDAQECAQECbSiFSwYjSAMGBQ4CAgEIPwMCAgIZFxQRAgQOBYMggQ9kqyGBL4o7BYxDF4FAP4ERJx+CTIROARECAR0HEYJzMYImAol7gkCDfocbjA4JApJmEgeBcYVdi0mKBwmPb4JsAhEUgSgmCidlcXAVOyoBgkE+kB9BMY8fgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,414,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="439699797"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2019 08:26:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1Q8Q4xq001623 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:26:05 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 03:26:04 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 03:26:04 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org" <draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
Thread-Index: AQHUzaIcsVx09DnBPUmXyV6SfrQVqaXyEkeA
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:26:03 +0000
Message-ID: <EBC0323D-DFF7-4A53-AEC4-03E014973B03@cisco.com>
References: <98cdd254-2bf8-4bac-ebbc-c8645ab8e0ea@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <98cdd254-2bf8-4bac-ebbc-c8645ab8e0ea@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.66.245.228]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EBC0323DDFF74A53AEC403E014973B03ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.158, xch-rtp-018.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/bUfDCVN6e21CPaDYKoAvwVMqEFc>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 08:26:10 -0000

Loa,

I am not aware of any IPR on this document.

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Feb 26, 2019, at 3:08 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:

Working Group, authors,

We have started to prepare draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
for working group adoption, prior to the wgap we need to do an IPR poll.

This mail starts this IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There no IPR disclosures against draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-
clarification.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


/Loa
mpls wg co-chair
--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64