Re: [mpls] [Bier] Encapsulation first nibble

"Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C857B1A8762; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbOLYqY5W8tL; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CEE41A1B57; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1621; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1426750871; x=1427960471; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9ztbs+LNwbJ/HUn2pqLLWGEkjB7FPgRMEz4ohL/JFIs=; b=IqjSYhzDMFFK86VLgUVEzx1ux8SaL4QgLiF81bn+HP5gq+78nxX1IxMN iGlybXGztK8M2tqRHPpKcSEnMP3m9cN9Is46cF7n0IHjivTBZZiL/9wOj PuXKsDg82jrfwZyWfoqcF0DeVxufHChlUuiIH/2w8Rzq9vjosghXUM5xB s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BTCgDofApV/5NdJa1cgwaBLLQWj0SILwKBR0wBAQEBAQF9hA8BAQEDATo/BQsCAQgOCh4QIRElAgQOBYgbAwkIyBkNhTABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiLF4JEgXozB4MXgRYFjjuCDoghgUyOAoYmIoNub4EEJIEbAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,428,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="404839026"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2015 07:41:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2J7f9lG024555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:41:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.114]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:41:09 -0500
From: "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
To: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bier] Encapsulation first nibble
Thread-Index: AQHQYec1U0ed6cLwWkSulZECuVCa0p0jbFFW
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:41:08 +0000
Message-ID: <95467337-1826-4C9E-888A-ABABE872CD56@cisco.com>
References: <55033E87.3030305@juniper.net> <5503403E.4050304@cisco.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0831CB77@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0831CBB2@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F1827D3C5@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <BY2PR05MB079ACD3AE28CC48B48C789ED4030@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0831CCE9@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <BY2PR05MB07904EDBB62DAF1E826E107D4000@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0831CEFD@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>, <550A2B98.4010409@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <550A2B98.4010409@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/c01Y6C4PnACU1PRHomzDi8opX38>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, BIER <bier@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>, "IJsbrand Wijnands (iwijnand)" <ice@cisco.com>, "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Bier] Encapsulation first nibble
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:41:16 -0000

That is correct.

PWE3 took over the design after draft-martini had been widely adopted and deployed, otherwise PWs may well have been exclusively CW. The wide deployment of Ethernet PW without the CW means that PW OAM is more complicated than it would otherwise be - see the latest vcxo over GAL draft from PALS. It was asserted in the early days that there would not be a problem because there would never be an ethernet address issued that alias with the IPv4 first nibble. Well guess what happened? Yes they were and yes there was!

There is another way forward, require the inclusion of the ELI and exclusive use of ELI enabled LSPs, but in that case the packet size would go up by more than needed to fix BIER and the operational complexity would be significant, thus the cure would be worse than the disease.

Stewart 

Sent from my iPad

> On 19 Mar 2015, at 01:51, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Since the control word is optional when transporting Ethernet over MPLS, I wonder whether the idea of reserving the first nibble value of 15 is feasible in practice.
> 
> Not using a control word for ethernet PW is painful from operational perspective. Many deployed platforms will look past the labels without much context and if they happen to find 4 or 6 there, the behavior will range from blindly believing that it is in fact IPv4 or IPv6 packet to trying to validate certain fields or even checksums. Control word helps here, and if both sides have support, it should be used.
> 
> Ignas
>