Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com> Fri, 29 April 2016 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A02712D63A; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jmpAuy-E1W-b; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E4712D096; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n10so54171877obb.2; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RPb7afSBJ6QWS2IFT5RR9TUn9f0nZRhz4wBWwAjnt74=; b=pFMsepvdVDEQ6fAcRfFJ4jJtQ+NC2xV8BgbnaLABV8X+FLe1pcga6KflRyGUMOe8EV 2dfrzv7xaKcdPXkMPr+e9b8XQMbdyMMd+sx9MsEXxMQX6z3Wo3bdrPQht39jyQHzhwKe WqGOw4DkHtt/c+FeJYlFYIqTNuhX0+L8uQR0nI8N/YgUKnKDB7Z7Ju472J7iwtdqVHGm AvEXa8yqYDcqhn9M7218M29iy5Nl1BcnEIhq+lNtM3xNRuSvrflD9yIzL4RRyppWD/bN My79sBY+DBuZEfBAmmHtoW/jH0jx+mvIRhdzS0zjsp04LlqvwC+LnwzkOkoQtfHBIk/u 1ZNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RPb7afSBJ6QWS2IFT5RR9TUn9f0nZRhz4wBWwAjnt74=; b=iUnptkdlM9TakXl7RDyniniLtjSS/MW37Re3/tl+U/KtZRLYL4aqXRw7J3ZelzQNC/ YSMhjTAINX+0UvKYH/2Xx+fKwSaUlU5DaYtZhGwYVZG960y0Ln4hXql9D54+eOSIxUHE tgYTtiYnADicPdUzuCfwN9F/PtX/xLeEvIaucpZZpmNbIJVwnyS2/5T7951rscg/eDm3 h4n13VrDZalD8IJ5lzoK7KEVngy+QehdRPQDMXi0BZrzwNgBslKW8bx3w1MPoL5JzrLC Bnw1OYKWWtrY5dn3ztMjDAawkgKIZbSvjrrBjQUqzS0Fpi3PVXvC+y2/oA3wIRgoX/2P vgmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUy+LDYXP5po2+zt7b29qwdJSISd2JG8KJqARzi/GRp00FdIEj8dHHKgHOL6SJ8g/cSuArQN+JbmDMECw==
X-Received: by 10.60.162.230 with SMTP id yd6mr10361729oeb.4.1461963699401; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.223.213 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A5F375@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu> <571E229B.2090405@gmail.com> <CAAA2pyd55Unb55tgzZ1G1C1RRDXkGYgWSf8qctfnM6=qUBkp6g@mail.gmail.com> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A5E5C2@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <571EF6B9.403@pi.nu> <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A5F375@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
From: Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:01:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOndX-tGKKjio9VYz2cDqX8MiVs5QRkA26OFNZei7_khfrGvgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5db6fafa3aa50531a5f2e2"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/c7ySHvJYIH2n3Tbwf-bmxREfg68>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:01:42 -0000
A response to an earlier email from Greg, addresses all comments in this email. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com > wrote: > Hi Loa, > if the WG decides to publish the document, then the Informational is the > right track. > > Appreciate authors to consider my comment on generalizing references to an > Entropy Label in the tuple as <ELI, ELn>. > > Regards, > Greg > > -----Original Message----- > From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 10:04 PM > To: Gregory Mirsky; George Swallow; Stewart Bryant > Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; > mpls-chairs@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on > draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label > > Greg, > > (talking about the SHOULDs in Section 4 only) > > I think what George (and Stewart) says is that since the document does not > use any MUST, SHALL or REQUIRED, it makes sense to publish it as an > Informational RFC. > > However, it does not work to turn that argument around and say that an > Informational RFC can't use the normative language, it was doen for example > in RFC 7412. > > I think we should change it to Informational, but there is no need to do > anything to the SHOULDs in section 4. > > /Loa > > On 2016-04-26 03:19, Gregory Mirsky wrote: > > Hi George, et. al, > > > > I've found several occurrences, three actually, of SHOULD being used > > in Section 4. > > > > And I agree with Stewart that application of <ELI, EL> is the local > > decision and, at most, this work can be published as Informational. > > > > One comment, suggestion: > > > > *the sample algorithm in Section 4 suggests that the same <ELI,EL> > > tuple been used multiple times whereas it may be advantageous to > > generalize and point that the different entropy label value may be > > used by referring to the tuple as <ELI, ELn> > > > > Regards, > > > > Greg > > > > *From:*mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *George > > Swallow > > *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2016 10:57 AM > > *To:* Stewart Bryant > > *Cc:* draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org; > > mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org > > *Subject:* Re: [mpls] working group last call on > > draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label > > > > Stewart - > > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stewart Bryant > > <stewart.bryant@gmail.com <mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I support this becoming a WG doc and thereby comming under WG control. > > > > The document is a WG doc. We are now in WG last call. > > > > However I am not sure about the dismissal of the option to reuse > > the ELI+EL. This clutters the stack less than the proposed option. > > > > Also I wonder why this is standards track? > > > > A reasonable question, particularly since there are no MUSTs, SHALLs > > or REQUIREDs. Will discuss with my Co-Chairs and ADs. > > > > Surely any equipment that understands the ELI can do this and thus > > this is just an informal description of the problem and a solution. > > > > Stewart > > > > > > > > On 23/04/2016 08:53, Loa Andersson wrote: > > > > Working Group, > > > > This is to initiate a two week working group last call on > > draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label. > > > > Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org > > <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>). > > > > There are no IPR disclosures against this document. > > > > All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on > > the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other > > IPRs that relates to this draft. > > > > This working group last call ends May 12, 2016. > > > > > > /Loa > > for the MPLS wg chairs > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Siva Sivabalan (msiva)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… George Swallow
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Rob Shakir
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Gmail
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Sri
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… Gmail
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-… stephane.litkowski
- [mpls] Closed - Re: working group last call on dr… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Closed - Re: working group last call o… Sri