Re: [mpls] [sfc] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

"Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca> Wed, 04 April 2018 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30208126CE8; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_AS420NPEv8; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta26.messagelabs.com [85.158.142.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689BA126CD8; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.142.99] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-5.bemta.az-a.eu-central-1.aws.symcld.net id DE/DA-11732-2C544CA5; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 03:25:54 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprEJsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsXi7PqsVfeQ65E ogxmruSxuLV3JatG0sInZ4smDrewOzB5Llvxk8ti9cQFTAFMUa2ZeUn5FAmvGvG3P2Au2mles fnySqYGxx6CLkZNDQsBPovfSNbYuRi4OIYE9jBKrjqxhBEkICVxnlLi9IgEicYpRYuWcT+wgC TYBA4n//1+wgtgiAqoSnSceMYPYzAJOEg3LL4M1Cwt4SvzvfQBV4yVx79VbFgg7SqJn20+wGh YBFYnGr9/BangFNCSat25ghljWwyrx//UJNpAEp0CgxO4pr8AWMwqISXw/tYYJYpm4xK0n85k gXhCQWLLnPDOELSrx8vE/VgjbQGLr0n0sELa8xK13c9ggev0klh5rhVosKHFy5hOoGkmJgytu sEB8ryzxa/8eRoiDFjBKPHq8BmqBvcT/Sz8YJzBKzUJyxywkc2chmQsR15O4MXUKG4StLbFs4 WtmCFtXYsa/QyzI4gsY2VcxWiQVZaZnlOQmZuboGhoY6BoaGusa6Job6CVW6SbqpZbqJqfmlR QlAiX1EsuL9Yorc5NzUvTyUks2MQJTBgMQ7GC8OTn5EKMkB5OSKK+11JEoIb6k/JTKjMTijPi i0pzU4kOMMhwcShK8i1yAcoJFqempFWmZOcDkBZOW4OBREuEtcQJK8xYXJOYWZ6ZDpE4xGnMc ej+lh5njHIgUYsnLz0uVEue9ADJJAKQ0ozQPbhAsqV5ilJUS5mUEOk2IpyC1KDezBFX+FaM4B 6OSMK8yyBSezLwSuH2vgE5hAjrFPu8AyCkliQgpqQZGzeN60kVM93ZUneXqmaAT6T814KH+21 vdnQ/aOBg2zy1vMCm1qL3bwLRoiVnJH/mLS45dvXpQ5aNFJtu9o/f7nJdpTNt0UcqKYcUsBU7 JJ282Tkm0O9vpwxxSnJITvFspUeHL4Z5Z8/++ftO/xuTxt0aRSw49LnwTw1/tX8F1I0JTUsL9 6lZmJZbijERDLeai4kQA4PZwYaUDAAA=
X-Env-Sender: daniel.bernier@bell.ca
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-224.messagelabs.com!1522812353!131303!1
X-Originating-IP: [67.69.230.133]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: outbound-route-from=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.9.15; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 18930 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2018 03:25:53 -0000
Received: from tls.exchange.bell.ca (HELO Tls.exchange.bell.ca) (67.69.230.133) by server-10.tower-224.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 4 Apr 2018 03:25:53 -0000
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: EX13EDGE02-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (198.235.102.33) by EX13EDGE02-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (198.235.68.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 23:25:47 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 23:25:52 -0400
Received: from DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::15cb:7efd:e348:57f4]) by DG1MBX04-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca ([fe80::15cb:7efd:e348:57f4%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 23:25:52 -0400
From: "Bernier, Daniel" <daniel.bernier@bell.ca>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
Thread-Index: AQHTx1ZOSRsC8e52o0Oa8xO4MYZ6y6Pn1BKAgAAD7oCAAA5dgIABgHeAgAHdPXWAAl2nAIABWLMo
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 03:25:52 +0000
Message-ID: <1522812352107.5966@bell.ca>
References: <2ac6b61d-3a38-1aaf-62ae-d923f1ad7468@pi.nu> <a392880f-6b86-4406-a348-42398e24285a.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> <DB5PR07MB158998C7FAAB4831C243D88D83A30@DB5PR07MB1589.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CA+b+ERnJNad6Awo+-2dU2kz6rwx-HQEniXcWgjoWUd-zm3r2qQ@mail.gmail.com> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C88828EFEB@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <CA+b+ER==g53MZK5RSNmaFkg1UBC8zEiNsfxNLKCNXDumannaHg@mail.gmail.com> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C88828F06D@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <052998BB-B820-412C-8363-B3EB7551B299@nokia.com> <1522554645079.8864@bell.ca>, <CA+b+ERmzFPZRyrCnBvnRVhK5F25RMc8+Wt-n6NXKrONWy9G+_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmzFPZRyrCnBvnRVhK5F25RMc8+Wt-n6NXKrONWy9G+_g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.24.25.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_15228123521075966bellca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Received-SPF: SoftFail (EX13EDGE02-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca: domain of transitioning daniel.bernier@bell.ca discourages use of 198.235.102.33 as permitted sender)
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: EX13EDGE02-WYN.bell.corp.bce.ca
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/cG--1HIPVGc8d6B60Z81ANBnv_E>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [sfc] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 03:25:59 -0000

Hi,


Robert, from what I gather, these labels (although it may be perceived as such) are there to represent in label stack format the SPI/SI of NSH providing path awareness at each hop in the network, not used in the forwarding path. The reference to SR seems only to be on wether one should use pop/swap or SR for transport ... not much added value in the draft except to affirm that it could run over an SR-MPLS implementation.


I agree that it is plays strangely close to SR architecture by the use of global labels for unique IDs. I am cautious about it though because it would mean that anyone that comes up with an idea of using globally assigned labels for a specific use case might be forbidden.


What I am really challenging is the necessity for this draft knowing that:

a) we have a working implementation of VPN based chaining with draft-bess-service-chaining where path info resides in BGP control-plane.

b) we have RFC8300 for service overlay where path info resides in the NSH header and is carried along the path.?

c) we have draft-xuclad-sr-service-chaining using segment-routing where path info is known at the edges and potentially computed at a controller.


Cheers,


Dan B

________________________________
From: rraszuk@gmail.com <rraszuk@gmail.com> on behalf of Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 7:35 AM
To: Bernier, Daniel
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Daniel,

I actually don't think that removal of SR references is a good thing here. The draft still uses source based label stacking as well as global (domain wide) meaning of a label. So even without calling it SR it is still based on SR architecture.

Best,
R


On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Bernier, Daniel <daniel.bernier@bell.ca<mailto:daniel.bernier@bell.ca>> wrote:

+1,

As explained on the list, with the SR reference removed from draft-barrel-mpls-sfc, I have no opposition for it to progress that is IF the WG actually believes it needs to. I did question it's need as an label based implementation of RFC7665 while we already draft-bess-service-chaining to do chain services on existing MPLS platforms.

Cheers,

Daniel Bernier