Re: [mpls] Two new drafts on (micro-)BFD over MC-LAG interfaces

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 04 April 2016 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C83712D8BE; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWzUQcHxFOPG; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB84F12D190; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.97.1] (unknown [66.129.239.15]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88B831E384; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:27:16 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FEE1AF2A-A2AE-4E9C-B4FF-7333D4D8EF4F"
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A3CCED@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:23:05 -0300
Message-Id: <C54D9C75-79FD-445C-A48E-1B9069B14578@pfrc.org>
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A3CCED@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/cIl7CcAJ6-RJJATIhPnCOCEZelM>
Cc: "draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip@tools.ietf.org" <draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd-chairs@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Two new drafts on (micro-)BFD over MC-LAG interfaces
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 22:23:14 -0000

Working Group,

These documents reasonably extend the existing BFD on LAG mechanism and would be reasonably in charter for BFD to pick up.

Greg, given that adoption seems a reasonable course, could you and the other co-authors state whether there's any known IPR on these documents?

-- Jeff

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> two new drafts, related to RFC 7130, were published before the meeting:
> ·         BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP network <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip-00>
> ·         BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP/MPLS network <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls-00>
>  
> Greatly appreciate your reviews, comments, questions and suggestions.
>  
> Regards,
>         Greg