Subject: Re: [mpls] Two new drafts on (micro-)BFD over MC-LAG interfaces
From: Jeffrey Haas <[email-masked]>
To: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:23:05 -0300
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>

Working Group,

These documents reasonably extend the existing BFD on LAG mechanism and would be reasonably in charter for BFD to pick up.

Greg, given that adoption seems a reasonable course, could you and the other co-authors state whether there's any known IPR on these documents?

-- Jeff

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:16 PM, Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> two new drafts, related to RFC 7130, were published before the meeting:
> ·         BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP network <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-ip-00>
> ·         BFD on MC-LAG interfaces in IP/MPLS network <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tanmir-rtgwg-bfd-mc-lag-mpls-00>
>  
> Greatly appreciate your reviews, comments, questions and suggestions.
>  
> Regards,
>         Greg