IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label-01

Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sboutros@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8276121E81E3 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iO-lwO0EDWgJ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAD121E818A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sboutros@cisco.com; l=336; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1332852966; x=1334062566; h=date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:message-id; bh=aNV6vk/nd9pSxRx2nXdtKE6CIJ6U3eWwI/GCH/X8Dbw=; b=iCNXORAd9A3YqRwu3+rZiYLugsO1ib6sDA1BHwRUD0FpOsAaukBLnbgp OINYBLwOx04qaM6eFip12VvI0+pA5mnL0UWwRuDnKbtPX7cJsDF3TViLL FCilqE9MCb8UFRYeRAVAbE3FOxZKeXplogLV0uh8XsYmCFTy+ARxAzta+ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAHi4cU+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABEiFCvcIEHggoBAQQSASUCPxAHOhAZPgY1h2cBmmifE5EPBIhYm06BaIMH
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,656,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="37753938"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2012 12:56:06 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2RCu6SZ015138; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:56:06 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-232.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.79]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:56:06 -0700
Received: from sboutros-wxp01.ciswco.com ([10.21.168.106]) by xfe-sjc-232.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:56:05 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:55:26 -0700
To: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
From: Sami Boutros <sboutros@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <859E7D41-481D-4941-A78F-4B5768864CB8@juniper.net>
References: <201008030024.o730OPqj027604@harbor.orleans.occnc.com> <859E7D41-481D-4941-A78F-4B5768864CB8@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-232ix4A2Dre00000023@xfe-sjc-232.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2012 12:56:06.0012 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9038BC0:01CD0C18]
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:56:07 -0000

Hi Kireeti,

I have one question about your presentation today.

With the ELI + EL under the tunnel label and above the AL, does that 
mean that all transient LSRs now while doing a label swap operation 
need to see if the label below the label to be swapped is an ELI and 
if so use the EL to pick the path?

Thanks,

Sami

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status