[mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 October 2024 03:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172913624169.1345315.7152074560321780444@dt-datatracker-78dc5ccf94-w8wgc>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:37:21 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 4Y4UIRBIBKQETXDGS56NKGWDZH2UIL3T
CC: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, tsaad@cisco.com
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: [mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/dRub0r9U-vGlpK4NYueQOaUMlUs>

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There are two SHOULDs in this document, and I wonder for each of them what the
impact is if an implementer were to deviate from that advice, or under what
circumstances one might legitimately do so.  There might be more to say in each
case.

[mpls] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
[mpls] Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Rakesh Gandhi