Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <inaminei@google.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E41129438 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYcapDHrnyLO for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4A91289B0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id z3so20785423wme.5 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e42sNM1NNe9nqmu7QmzRNQySIYmFG0yULBohsfykz2E=; b=Ms8Smcp7UzMhjuoIrmjfy0+McJc34e4F59rXZr9x6I6PqK0Q/qL2RAH9EczWCIqBaR 6eUnUwJ6AvBOE0Isf1tmOUS3cXTuMWPe2RAnT3f27xAsCaOkune8wO5xWr/0fWEXSd/H 89cvwPolAa4+XAzrvahHUy2Ca2GZ3D1AypaQZcAdFIHQ+vdLHLJVcV8dzPm189NyghLF B3UX4KEePz7IQ5IZ/Sd+mvhPoDg7yeP9AZ9fFT23BixluQUKcekrS8fZLl+27mD3mgHC B7XXiTMu4/74P0ocpOwpSp/TeUQqrdibLYqIFLoipeVxsrcJ+hLkUSSfltWO5S0L/UxJ K9Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e42sNM1NNe9nqmu7QmzRNQySIYmFG0yULBohsfykz2E=; b=bCoZmoQHYTtrw5foF5OwS4AeFfK3l8mKgGtYmoA4Ogfi+0qx4optUFvGw9FlBY56mS sKA0yeVzQR4/DpAoWFjcZhcAtkTp2/HL8xVt3DCwn9eSw857DPoJy9k9ssBwjHbfU+RQ n2bq6QcLJvRuXp9USnODznDMRf94DkL/0pze/aWi0mKTbw+07ZQoGejzz0U2JoVQTjim TjA/48A82wKSacss0/DKYAOLmyaJhXiRbm6ROpspaVxyGJi4DKmikHlbUPbsVmvxJ4sM ZzsLHqgz6uke8oAfb54uW0+cLLq6bofUWKUir4vsGWzrrWHgWQdW4+jcLiT2AdP01LHI CCig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5tsD6qKICdfhMe+fzHLKP2U0g5v3oW/zluxWSowFtts8t9vX8Q MvBGCcKQW8/pR0ywWDt9tf7jbhD2tOPp7qdejUIzfA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZbO008wcU0eLbEt2jmyV86jeJWVmujIydBWSOG80d1L+bInpzZvAgb1VkyVsKM20p6xuuvBNR4N3dCabPw16I=
X-Received: by 10.80.146.83 with SMTP id j19mr16816720eda.298.1510654301535; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.203.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:11:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1BDB8DC5-701A-4989-9818-AD5D0830AA8D@cisco.com>
References: <3a590768494f45208f2c568b80913b91@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <1BDB8DC5-701A-4989-9818-AD5D0830AA8D@cisco.com>
From: Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:11:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG4Q_atyAOTg3bziY6sJAjXRdzLJ-bURE5bUF+O_K6NTUmrUVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
Cc: "N.Leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c3ce806119a055dee9d2e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/dU0p0yfZWmjaPdWSTnAQ-9BRcNM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:11:49 -0000

I am not aware of any additional IPR other than what was disclosed and that
applies to this draft.

ina

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Tarek Saad (tsaad) <tsaad@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am not aware of any additional IPR other than what was disclosed and
> that applies to this draft.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tarek
>
>
>
> *From: *"N.Leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
> *Date: *Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 5:01 AM
> *To: *"mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <
> mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
> *Resent-From: *<alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> *Resent-To: *<csekar@juniper.net>, <inaminei@google.com>, <
> dante.j.pacella@verizon.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad@cisco.com>
> *Resent-Date: *Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 5:01 AM
>
>
>
> Working Group,
>
>
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr for working group
> last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>
>
>
> This is to start the IPR Poll.
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr?
>
>
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> Please note that there is already one IPR disclosed for the individual
> document:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2580/
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The document
> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
>
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Nic
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>