Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 29 May 2020 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A033A0CEB; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a7kT9MX9rT4j; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650F63A0CEC; Fri, 29 May 2020 01:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C1BEB103F2BCCB109B3F; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:37:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.50) by lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:36:57 +0100
Received: from DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.32) by lhreml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:36:57 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.30]) by DGGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::89ed:853e:30a9:2a79%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:36:51 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
Thread-Index: AQHWNYMTrUMa0gK1W0GwVEUIwKrzfai+KHkAgACUtWA=
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 08:36:51 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE297BA5A53@dggeml510-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <ab000307-8571-7242-20b9-4ac82ae3122c@pi.nu> <614ab2bc-2f1e-e5ea-d0da-a7f2f3868e39@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <614ab2bc-2f1e-e5ea-d0da-a7f2f3868e39@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.203.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/dqMKZAJEdW-unINnccxRZIvRmo0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 08:37:08 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPR applies to this document.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu]
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 3:43 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; mpls-ads@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org
> Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
> 
> Working Group, authors, (fixed the subject line)
> 
> 
> We are preparing  draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl for the working group last call
> (wglc) The first step is an IPR poll..
> 
> This mail starts this IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to  draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
> 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374- sfl.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
> email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The
> response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The document will
> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR
> that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> 
> /Loa
>    mpls wg co-chair
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64