IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F30D1B5F59; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PorNRifYEUEr; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359CF1B46E7; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=970; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443630505; x=1444840105; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=yLSeC4QFyy9GH3heQdZ0GBOt50JCfDiql2mYoeUG8sk=; b=JXTMogekKIAgz2xcDW88FFSAp0rCVBn6svGc1zVB0DxaYyA9r9hMRk8Q cGO0k4M/kHiZfSQsjukGa8I4PS+q75i6WLO9hBuNlG6quDX87YMp2wUbS R6CUtMTJuH6UdLDf34FbchiI76AsM7baX3D42v2XBoaj5APbuG+cX88A3 s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgC8DAxW/4wNJK1egySBQQa5SIQhAQ2HdAIcgRs4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQlAQEENEUQAgEIHCgCAjAlAgQBDQWILplvnSQGlE8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgRyFVwGEfIRaMweCY4FJAQSSRoMyAY0Sm1AfAQFCgkSBPnGIdYEFAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,613,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="192697892"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2015 16:28:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8UGSNUt024628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:28:23 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:28:22 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (173.37.183.76) by xch-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:28:22 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.98]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:28:21 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQ+y2shocw9CdOr0a0uhi2/UxT8Z5U38WAgACJLAD//9qpAA==
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:28:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D2317787.D476F%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20150930031111.861.10509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <560B7385.6050401@pi.nu> <D2315C8F.122592%swallow@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2315C8F.122592%swallow@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.24]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <D3A42D1FD8490D408E249BA96D596BE9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/e0Tv7sUoos_Z8oZvSWH-tVwXsTE>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:28:25 -0000

On 9/30/15, 8:41 AM, "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com> wrote:

>OLD:
>
>   The Type of the Relay Node Address Stack TLV is chosen from the range
>   32768 to 49161 so that (per section 3 of [RFC4379] an LSR that does
>   not recognize the TLV knows that the TLV is optional and can safely
>   ignore it.
>
>
>
>NEW:
>
>   The Type of the Relay Node Address Stack TLV is chosen from the range
>   Range defined in [RFC4379] as "optional TLVs that can be silently
>   dropped if not recognized².  An LSR that does
>   not recognize the TLV SHOULD ignore it.

If you want to add some of this text instead of what I suggested (see my
other e-mail), I’m fine too.

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email