Re: [mpls] [E] Corection - IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp

"Jalil, Luay" <> Fri, 08 April 2016 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFC212D8A9; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTGy0Ix6BDjF; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 04:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A2F12D6BF; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 04:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;;; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1460113943; x=1491649943; h=from:to:date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=IXO5Nb85CQl6iktYsrHhflrAXHf7oALUjxhsK30S1rs=; b=eAPQUphVbHypLqCa4DuEvLgcF3yswYNqz/obBDIN8m1NT/bpk0DGgYEW AI2dA23TI12/0h8kcxPgrAgkf0IUitDhRejrrw0iWsQIrmMjlOOBIXnfg 77lxrbslYa1nXnf3P2S1JwN0YU8uld8P4W7remnYKrnv4S4Qs/5lplk0k U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2016 11:11:52 +0000
From: "Jalil, Luay" <>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,449,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217";a="658316540"
Received: from (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2016 11:11:50 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:11:49 -0400
To: Loa Andersson <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:11:49 -0400
Thread-Topic: [E] Corection - [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp
Thread-Index: AdGRh3ICUD8fn5sqTkSYhzTPNSmvCA==
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D32D181BC35B3luayjaliloneverizoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [E] Corection - IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:12:26 -0000

Not aware of any


From: Loa Andersson <<>>
Date: Friday, April 8, 2016 at 7:12 AM
To: "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: [E] Corection - [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp


Sorry I had a cut and paste error in the two first paragraphs of this
mail, it should have read:

   The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp has told us that
   the document is ready for working group last call.

   We will do an IPR poll prior to the start of wglc.

I apologize for the mistake!


On 2016-04-08 03:04, Loa Andersson wrote:
Working Group,

The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp has told us that
the document is ready to be considered for working adoption.

The document been through MPLS-RT review. We will do an IPR poll
prior to the start of the adoption poll.

This mail starts the IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this document.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

mpls wg co-chair