Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143812D670; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dc7aG28pZA27; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5370C12D679; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u206so142626745wme.1; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ERMuIaqMyS6FUU42yN+MIrBfXvIYz0J0i1HiVTA4lrc=; b=xPrkAfP5te4nBp8umm+JwHwzuIi/Bn0r+oh1W1TD3zJolmJ+S9Y8THzEEL8DR/xYot a+wB5WsCQZRxA43EiVHdDfE53U9fGwxYY5SL3kBpM5MrDPk4cnlLiLiFjMDcmjQW/Aej G8QlD5csLHbzEj4Im6whataYVlM1Ud1FZP372/wnFMmQ7l/zP7pAq1b6g6te4rBrbAo1 +TJIaV0Lr8QYNgVlIkKIWU1YM/fvxssP+CZLdI/gDu7SsSHKoSgk5+fYZZgmk+D06AzD bpwzOPJ0JnIEKIFFmaN+tNwtlpFxz1vsMNvwXg3OvPwpDReriqiD0RLwS7Eaj5CcJzlK H3hQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ERMuIaqMyS6FUU42yN+MIrBfXvIYz0J0i1HiVTA4lrc=; b=Xlna3FUuuJ6fmM7+nK4+Qg0WoNuk31aTnzSExliI9LJ20oVwoZbTZKzH6lSBlHUGCF ICPmeH+HIHM+t5vT1CCiu/5xGjSSfOojM22GAdf4gM/n2l1dtcGVVP2W0Eh+s/iqk+oY CvCnOLn/iRDej4JnRbhhY74GYW7UGmc2NtGdNXJzvyD8tTdQHX3xlZLH9RnOrNm6Dt5f 2Aj4SFzWrm+2Uce8t9L9azuPxnZ/w5HiO4R/Zt3mGaUrcPSG6FskGMRj01fEV636vSuG G5WyzO9E9V3RmXGMZ8NSp5/l9+tkqGd6VFAKop0UsDTfeBXxia9P0MSXHYFapbU5gr+w 6MzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUeM87R3FdWLlLX6afhmxidAiquM0al6qvQAZa3KA7N7mFJGh8O8Z0US5H2ULGDEw==
X-Received: by 10.28.59.133 with SMTP id i127mr5558366wma.24.1461610996894; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jh2sm24966344wjb.39.2016.04.25.12.03.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: George Swallow <swallow.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu> <571E229B.2090405@gmail.com> <CAAA2pyd55Unb55tgzZ1G1C1RRDXkGYgWSf8qctfnM6=qUBkp6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <571E69F2.8020506@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:03:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAA2pyd55Unb55tgzZ1G1C1RRDXkGYgWSf8qctfnM6=qUBkp6g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000400040602010606000104"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eGpUtE_3XXcuO5MAHEQrz3b47BA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:26 -0000


On 25/04/2016 18:57, George Swallow wrote:
> Stewart -
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Stewart Bryant 
> <stewart.bryant@gmail.com <mailto:stewart.bryant@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I support this becoming a WG doc and thereby comming under WG
>     control.
>
>
> The document is a WG doc.   We are now in WG last call.

Sorry, I missed that :( I should have read the subject!

>     However I am not sure about the dismissal of the option to reuse
>     the ELI+EL. This clutters the stack less than the proposed option.
>
>     Also I wonder why this is standards track?
>
>
> A reasonable question, particularly since there are no MUSTs, SHALLs 
> or REQUIREDs.  Will discuss with my Co-Chairs and ADs.

Well that brings me to wonder what needs to be specified, since action 
when the label stack is pushed is a local matter and as I remember a 
number of the rejected strategies are just normal MPLS.

- Stewart


>     Surely any equipment that understands the ELI can do this and thus
>     this is just an informal description of the problem and a solution.
>
>     Stewart
>
>
>     On 23/04/2016 08:53, Loa Andersson wrote:
>
>         Working Group,
>
>         This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
>         draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label.
>
>         Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list
>         (mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).
>
>         There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>         All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have
>         stated on
>         the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any
>         other
>         IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
>         This working group last call ends May 12, 2016.
>
>
>         /Loa
>         for the MPLS wg chairs
>
>
>