[mpls] MPLS-RT review on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-00

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 15 February 2019 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CD6130F28; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:35:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mb43B8rIxUor; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884B7130E7E; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:35:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 91253463B076B3A3321B; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:35:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:35:01 +0000
Received: from lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:35:02 +0000
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml708-chm.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:35:01 +0000
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 16:34:54 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: MPLS-RT review on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-00
Thread-Index: AdTFCCSJ+LGMIYq7QLWdBvABpp77Vg==
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:34:54 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE29288B44F@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eGsTxRlWjfZ5cIVjjwVfF4qYboI>
Subject: [mpls] MPLS-RT review on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 08:35:06 -0000

Hi all,

I have done the MPLS-RT review on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-00.

This is a very short and well-written draft that addresses the clarify how the length of the Segment ID Sub-TLVs should be computed to include in the Length field of the Sub-TLVs which may result in interoperability issues.

This is a useful document and ready for WG adoption, even for WG last call :-). 

Best regards,