[mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6313)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 20 October 2020 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0DB3A1042 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFokJi4f_xwV for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14EC03A1040 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C5CDAF406F4; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: ice@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com, mnapierala@att.com, n.leymann@telekom.de, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20201020094945.C5CDAF406F4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:49:45 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eazBOSI3gSw9OET4Vd9mDBdFSb8>
Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6313)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 09:49:50 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6512, "Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6313 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@rbbn.com> Section: 3.2.1 Original Text ------------- Since P1 has no root to PE2, PE1 needs to originate an mLDP message with a FEC element that identifies ASBR1 as the root. Corrected Text -------------- Since P1 has no route to PE2, PE1 needs to originate an mLDP message with a FEC element that identifies ASBR1 as the root. Notes ----- "no root to PE2" does not parse and looks as a typo. And it is quite clear from the context that "no route to PE2" is intended. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6512 (draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-recurs-fec-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Using Multipoint LDP When the Backbone Has No Route to the Root Publication Date : February 2012 Author(s) : IJ. Wijnands, E. Rosen, M. Napierala, N. Leymann Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6512 (6313) RFC Errata System