Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 12:09 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C50012D76A; Tue, 31 May 2016 05:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5a0j4g-tBE9S; Tue, 31 May 2016 05:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0D212D796; Tue, 31 May 2016 05:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1950; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464696516; x=1465906116; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HdaGdbieoo4nbOAQWs2g986eOQjwaWGpOAadAnTrVfU=; b=mfihLsCtSSiljd1IGtlyV5OuhelR6wJ9S7cjGrzPlg1eMLK3Oxpn1cjh ur7SntTM4tyiVieC5l8wPwDRXVnagtxave96EN6WJkYbdHYnU7pgiF90p YMaJQ5d0xmz2hH9Uk+Vkl7QMjWRzJphMvZsBIoml9sVN9Q6Ql4mg1+7ZE s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AQAgADfk1X/4MNJK1cgzxWfQaDPapVi28BDYF6FwuEX4EQAhyBIDgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEYBAQQBAQEgETcDCw4CAgEIGgImAgICGQYGCxUQAgQBDQWIFQMXDqwEjFMNhB8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBQV8iXOCQ4FPEQEcF4Jygj0cBZgEMwGMJoF5gWmET4hkh2SHZwEeAQFCgjiBNW6JAzZ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,395,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="278338423"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 31 May 2016 12:08:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4VC8Ymr012101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 31 May 2016 12:08:35 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:08:33 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:08:33 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
Thread-Index: AQHRuuypAo4BBt6OrUOrnvkFc9q/SZ/S9G+A
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:08:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D372F6EA.62C2E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <2D2BDAB7-3016-4BDF-BFED-CB53ACD37C5F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D2BDAB7-3016-4BDF-BFED-CB53ACD37C5F@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <144578E177BFC346A65EDB2BD6AA8F55@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eqStJVfcYRWW4ESvubGqnnKymSs>
Cc: "draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org>, "draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org" <draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:09:50 -0000
I support MPLS WG adoption as well. Acee On 5/30/16, 11:29 PM, "mpls on behalf of Jeff Tantsura" <mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >Yes/support > > >>>Working Group, >>> >>>This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static- >>>yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group >>>documents. >>> >>>Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working >>>group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical >>>motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that >>>the document should not be adopted as a working group document. >>> >>>There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has >>>been started in parallel to this adoption poll >>> >>>The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR >>>poll has concluded. >>> >>>/Loa >>> >>>MPLS wg co-chair. >>>-- >>> >>> >>>Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >>>Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >>>Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>mpls mailing list >>mpls@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chenxia (D)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Tarek Saad (tsaad)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Wen, Bin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Raqib Jones
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Loa Andersson