Re: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02

"George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com> Tue, 14 May 2013 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E25121F84AF for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OPmB4XqVu1D for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A540121F8519 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2013 08:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5445; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1368545185; x=1369754785; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=p+GqR5o4ROYdDczT0KMY9dgC/ssOsvfhfMO6u3iihFk=; b=iwT4ZsrYVku2aEA/4/ekjO/do91mn4l5Xs0ZNVFryYgUz6wAITaXvSn4 2na7j9LHZ0a4EAGn7Q3cy3bvXUkqeXSnC3cjL1Wg8asT7LXklir7b2zYT PBUONPXY7zXyh2p+KzkIbhEPkgicbnu1xmuJo3PEMbcIU9eJMghUpMG3I 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAO5WklGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABagkNEwGJ/FnSCHwEBAQQtQQsSAQgOAwMBAgsdORQJCAEBBAENBQiIBK5XjzKObSARB4J0YQOocYFXgTiCJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,671,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="210296991"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2013 15:26:25 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4EFQON8023396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 May 2013 15:26:24 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.56]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 14 May 2013 10:26:24 -0500
From: "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org" <draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02
Thread-Index: Ac5KBNrRqy5GgTuxR1iRJSatXBuqdwGuuqEA
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:26:23 +0000
Message-ID: <2FE467D3673DCE409A84D67EC2F607BB0FA778AF@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD316C3ED09@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [10.98.56.166]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2FE467D3673DCE409A84D67EC2F607BB0FA778AFxmbrcdx10ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:27:01 -0000

With hat off.

No/do not support.

I believe that making a single sub-TLV space is going to lead to a lot of confusion in the future as to which sub-TLVs are used with which TLVs.  That is one will have to search through bunch of documents instead of seeing it clearly laid out in the registry.

Keeping the spaces separate for RSVP has worked well.  I really don't get what is preventing that here.

George

From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net<mailto:rcallon@juniper.net>>
Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013 10:53 PM
To: "mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>" <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>, "draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry@tools.ietf.org>>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [mpls] Poll for WG adoption for draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02

Working group,

this is to start a "two week" poll on adopting
draft-pac-mpls-lsp-ping-tlvs-and-sub-tlvs-registry-02
as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>).

This poll will end May 20th, 2013.

Ross
(as mpls wg co-chair)