[mpls] thought about the ADI name
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 19 December 2021 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BA13A0E43 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yq7gHtNEHkuS for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E291C3A0E42 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (unknown [122.2.110.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B5D365792 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:31:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <9e553dc9-34d1-44d5-1e33-41e4a3372597@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:31:38 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-CA
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/f4dZbU5H4kd1pDDO1o4rv0Rme4w>
Subject: [mpls] thought about the ADI name
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:31:51 -0000
Working Group, The MIAD Requirement Specification use the abbreviation ADI, it stands for Ancillary Data Indicator. Which is all nice and dandy. But isn't it he case that the indicator gives us two things, the action to be performed and where to find the data needed, i.e., an Ancillary Data and Action indication (ADAI?). No I'm not suggesting that we change, but we should be aware, and it would be nice to have it mentioned somewhere. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] thought about the ADI name Haoyu Song