[mpls] thought about the ADI name

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 19 December 2021 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BA13A0E43 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yq7gHtNEHkuS for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E291C3A0E42 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 08:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (unknown [122.2.110.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B5D365792 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:31:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <9e553dc9-34d1-44d5-1e33-41e4a3372597@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:31:38 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-CA
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/f4dZbU5H4kd1pDDO1o4rv0Rme4w>
Subject: [mpls] thought about the ADI name
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:31:51 -0000

Working Group,

The MIAD Requirement Specification use the abbreviation ADI, it stands 
for Ancillary Data Indicator. Which is all nice and dandy.

But isn't it he case  that the indicator gives us two things, the action 
to be performed and where to find the data needed, i.e., an Ancillary 
Data and Action indication (ADAI?).

No I'm not suggesting that we change, but we should be aware, and it 
would be nice to have it mentioned somewhere.

/Loa
-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64