Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796C31B361B;
 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 66NRm79gJlsz; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931411B360B;
 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1364; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
 t=1440678598; x=1441888198;
 h=reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:
 mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=ODxUfDriVhFfhEEExLlRZ6IiE5viUitDdW1HBFZadjQ=;
 b=YZRc0vaGhIZcx7n0uWXcsPv3AmE418r2bAaPcCZdwaLeN0N1D888NeSa
 9GVYgbObHs7BEM6s3WEh8f7T7zwa0VzPZJvIexoUpZeNC4RKgZSor96Hi
 tzLpbqKjuVhsQ8Odhxg7gF0JuP0N2gMNWN+Y/K8HwZd5435eU9JsgB7+z s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,422,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="611219572"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com)
 ([173.38.203.22])
 by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2015 12:29:57 +0000
Received: from [64.103.106.133]
 (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-133.cisco.com [64.103.106.133])
 by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7RCTuuO023136;
 Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:29:56 GMT
References: <55DEC8FA.4040700@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <55DF02CA.5000006@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:30:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55DEC8FA.4040700@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fNo0a6QZ3HgXSdXue1MHsoVN8EY>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>,
 draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>,
 <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
 <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:30:00 -0000

I am unaware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Stewart

On 27/08/2015 09:23, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path has told us that
> the document is ready for working group last call.
>
> Before we start the wglc we will do an IPR poll.
>
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-
> udp-return-path?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There are no IPR disclosures filed against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

