Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F394A3A08E2 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 06:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3NW8KYwMIgpu for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 06:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D9A3A08DB for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 06:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id g5so16522099otg.6 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 06:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zVLPrKJxuxwe8QiKj+N8zjAmX4Kn4xCeN8Mcc6nc3lk=; b=Mo4kxh1whPPb26Ojl+hB33k0B9A2/1vw4nssZge8YMbKzMDhkh9l8kq/UMJMQSWFFo WWEwTUy3+qrMaCJieo7YtNd7KeW/y1iQWaEkiON2xKXdP4fOR/2oNRj2DAu8KHrW6MZh 4JJ2vQbHhD+AA1pZaKKa6UIoKnMW7IG1oxvhYa6LCE9GJUzLPMY9vWoUpzigeNlAWlgd +0Dfx9rV0ruDVKVEbzBUncF8GFH4F1bilgaxh8FODFGPzVLorA8syIHkMQx2UWSjVYno 9dRoSO15YkUXPyw/43FEQhQRF5oHjbCM9s+2mcMg8WeGF7hV2ooeNgr74u+XqLZP43v3 ny0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zVLPrKJxuxwe8QiKj+N8zjAmX4Kn4xCeN8Mcc6nc3lk=; b=PTxvodRDECTtjC6JdRkZrqImpi3s2nvd70pxRSTgAbzN8c2zAJ4xWf7YFcD5AK6rGj cBXlQXLJg/q5DL0Eh8PvQoFnFPNClTdpcaZR1KATM0A+aCcZBhBWyIzS2dwiwFVH41e1 Pq/93jqCPKThw7lN1sKYuuF+fGswISrzVorpJ74xFXblKUC+/8SmIjESFgxVboqXjXGK TkmyZK7eMY41q5MjVN9pUg2oE+OlX/oBrAsSL2bDgQAi0VvpZ9juTw0SJmC8RD6+gNQb AjKwM3sl3/L96kfhbCtBgkAdaaXMABs/NduYYgn30o8F29LqqtUz7VpuUgSOhr0/8HCf 58tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iqygQKjH2inCsfr9iuu14yur1S+9XweoLIlDhO4eBjUorymPk Gtf641J8hKmTxRL2oTJMlIoVEJaMRQp2ktsWETQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+3wHF6iLKJzlot4XPFF7JakNWpiKFiIUpLjnCOXSbW8cOpKtT4HA73KzFRVYadwsjojD5kwWHqAJquR4LcsA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1a7:: with SMTP id e36mr20906681ote.215.1591708004985; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 06:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200603102000.31C90F40751@rfc-editor.org> <25ca1341-454d-854e-8724-f60df98c0bdb@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <25ca1341-454d-854e-8724-f60df98c0bdb@pi.nu>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:06:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfLGzNNF9z+pf8tQ7tXkJDT-_+ZFnL_G95gwZzJo=gsPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, George Swallow <swallow.ietf@gmail.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTSI)" <db3546@att.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com, mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003989e505a7a66682"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fjUAO8QDFrZsS-xOwFmy1AlyaOQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4090 (6203)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:06:48 -0000

Sure

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:48 AM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> All,
>
> I think this errata in essence is correct, though I would want to
> propose a slight modification to the Corrected Text.
>
> On 03/06/2020 18:20, RFC Errata System wrote:
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4090,
> > "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6203
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Mihir Amrelia <mihiramrelia_89@yahoo.com>
> >
> > Section: 6
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR SHOULD try
> to
> > provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR SHOULD
> then try
> > to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.
> >
> >
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > If the "Bandwidth Protection Desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE,
> the PLR
> > SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible,
> the PLR
> > SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full
> bandwidth.
> >
> >
>
> Slightly Corrected Text
> --------------
> If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE,
> the PLR
> SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible,
> the PLR
> SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full
> bandwidth.
>
> Note 1: lowercase is how the document treat all othr names of flags in
> flowing text.
>
> Note 2: with this slight change I think this Errata could be verified
> and held for a document update.
>
> /Loa
>
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Correcting flag info to consider bandwidth protection.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC4090 (draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-fastreroute-07)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
> > Publication Date    : May 2005
> > Author(s)           : P. Pan, Ed., G. Swallow, Ed., A. Atlas, Ed.
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> > Area                : Routing
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
>
> --
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>