IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Updated rev -09 posted [Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Mon, 23 March 2020 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FC83A0901; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=L1VDwz28; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=nK4NilB5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkNx_6Z-hE_6; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5FA3A0926; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1584952371; x=1586161971; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4ucj64Fx0v0Oz34KowdU2DEAL3WDknqRGSZ9+kHZcJE=; b=L1VDwz28RjwcFHPcPmTD6zjcUOYW/IC1U/V5wxx0USL2M3il5p7KleZY ZXESeBHsrXMy6zFCN5F4D/eg0UHM/yq8FPevHaaPYl/0R3uNPZcFchCYL +cG+x9LWvkJZn4xn7UtF8UUB4CM/ghtVJqj/wlIGJhBZFdq2avWxDxvmu 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:JkxsjxRqbp+Ga5ItXrlqmXikwdpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiEkDcJJV1JN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CcBQAec3he/5JdJa1mHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVFAFgUQgBAsqhBiDRQOKcYJfiWqOMoJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGERQIXgg0kOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhWMBAQEBAxIREQwBATcBCwQCAQgRAwECAwIfBwICAh8RFQUDCAIEAQ0FIoMEgkwDLgGgbQKBOYhidYEygn8BAQWFGg0LggwJgQ4qjC8agUE/gREnIIJNPoIbgjAXgnoygiyOAII8O58WRAqCPI0xhRkEhDkdm1mDUos7i0SQLQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVZQGCQVAYDY4dOIM7hFmFfHSBKY1tAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,295,1580774400"; d="scan'208";a="655179356"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 23 Mar 2020 08:32:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02N8WnH0007903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:32:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 03:32:49 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 03:32:49 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 03:32:49 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=T4QKRrAwryIQ0d6Teg7RKqg9bewIhOpoDCnePRb5ROZqzSwz4G0jEDNMgAwe7XynG0JIeVfEFcv/k15OxXhYj+2Gd9pq5P0rQETtLijoON1Jdkv/x4FcUoAGLh01K6FsMPryQ3y3bYK1pt8O5N3LFD4ipU52kLG0Ejhv5oJEZjexz/H0fTEOXKpyKFnwF46O23uj3zQ9QsmbI1HEUxro+jTOA8o4hei1u6ZF4ZWU69m/a5g/kEnUpNp5bdMU54rgrHbMtcmFCfdT292kL8esGLvUSF3j2wmmhNLjLTGHO1hmAOZRaKrWHIaryi3MzBLqlhzDsbcL2vHGG3q0GqzXEA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=4ucj64Fx0v0Oz34KowdU2DEAL3WDknqRGSZ9+kHZcJE=; b=bcKEZgo57lga+V99ehGcNKHAidHKBsdc04Y4iytBOjJPSZX8nfPqq9ZKjvP/eUQxZKdiyhX14hbpMl+04PqB7UGprzw1LdRKaXWD2MxjX2iuwam7ufbELuSLMADQ9lhMYF8xRUeD5q64NosgjpQyAagBJ4itJ3J5/7rXFbNhir3d+fzkL2moYiWVvzESsLOQieScXl604Hh61kv1xOVvqieEeGhJ2ck62HVwVt8RSd4TEE/K9W3RZ4SR0uQli5C3L25lJUelgVqWtmrCBXXgbF8wit1duw8Qn8F6byPEgHKuGcctO0VLuTO1KdCylCHyClEsOwOEFfsRmiWuVW9STA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4ucj64Fx0v0Oz34KowdU2DEAL3WDknqRGSZ9+kHZcJE=; b=nK4NilB5yb9/UxSMNNQwg+78eBDd0PLgB/Nzr0fTtuBmehGdpOpd5KSY84GY/3ubd2zKV5RNlPCvw04vFpaw46gf3Ms2E//feCpbRjT5LBVsk6dMLnAkSM7Wtn8+fBOB3r1dsK7m79FpR+BJ4UMlL+l/7QqDnJ+K5kCWKeF42gk=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1915.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:110::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2835.20; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:32:48 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::680d:e22e:72d5:67ca%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2835.021; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:32:48 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Thread-Topic: Updated rev -09 posted [Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thread-Index: AQHV/wFKGjUSI9V/506cA5uNNVprzahV7gOA
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:32:48 +0000
Message-ID: <C19B3480-6B1F-40FD-A68B-CD56E7EAFC65@cisco.com>
References: <F52EEFB1-C793-43D3-991A-FD6284FD3F6A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F52EEFB1-C793-43D3-991A-FD6284FD3F6A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:f902:b9f0:3721:7a4a]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a567714c-9c3d-429d-78f3-08d7cf04c4be
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1915:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB19151AA8A16B3D92963BB05AA9F00@DM5PR11MB1915.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0351D213B3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(199004)(54906003)(2616005)(15650500001)(110136005)(53546011)(6506007)(71200400001)(316002)(6512007)(2906002)(86362001)(4326008)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(478600001)(8936002)(36756003)(224303003)(76116006)(91956017)(66946007)(33656002)(6486002)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(5660300002)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB1915; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AoexZ094H4Atxs8XwAdVTw/g5iKQ9fyEfzzNlag89n7iqnUdntDungEJX+qmplMZ7ILXhCChKLhc9inX2enFA87rxirKHCjleIetQpQ2zvWmmJ5YRbftATJCDtcIaCbL1/aPGeLfmFeJHRlcaTNiSEZj1+VkOZYsq5gsNKFwW+vV3llHvHyCFOD6yzpIMq7EZEWrttUZxdUfogoKUBSK5xVILa8xOZz4m7LySBidzLkDzKprzu27bUa3rEiyQ1szC+FUuZwpihfDzkPaNK+X9UqV3l34C21HoMjS2eMRZ5IqtVr/OB1J74CHulWLoIHjs2T0NXs8YGUd296fMickt5SYA0yPA+OivuLKScGlcpR8JNQMbcVVZEKOvxVmzc0yct6RZ4BkMvCZRX2RXeJzQ8KfrnAp+KNzafuVR+BA16t6CgQ9XbtMa0PJ7O8cwi7m
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 9dKVZtE1Jl3DcO/fa85AxbwHw6ACkUarYCH74cAJdVgTp4YWqv0BTWwIG+Qr3wKKN4APOcaCB/axBL3UmSG0l3gtXzr5iHAzJB+6S1CxM9ePlqE2SajrmsD/Gl172HcrnNl4spDEtVfyRN3Hi9b2xyIXYWu6t66cJFgBER7WpXYE7JIQ3pSJLIR/qtuxX5EZJc8T0VsL0TMvU5AnL9g5qA==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1E9C85737846364AB7559538A2500A56@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a567714c-9c3d-429d-78f3-08d7cf04c4be
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Mar 2020 08:32:48.2171 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: iVZYNokcAPwogBm66PPoZwfM6LDwBtlGB3xT4PXaEbgt3sdc+M9Kno236ATDGl3HsRp+Xh+CEQUF8e9j7XM8MA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1915
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fwHk7TyivY_J3kmjxZeVme-sRQ0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Updated rev -09 posted [Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:32:54 -0000

Kamran,

Thank you for the final edit, I have cleared my DISCUSS and balloted a 'no objection' to publish this document.

Regards

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2020 at 22:48
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leymann@telekom.de>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Updated rev -09 posted [Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]

    Eric,
    
    I have posted rev -09 where we have moved I-D.ietf-rtgwg-policy-model to normative reference.
    Hope this addresses last of your comment.
    
    Rgds.
    --
    Kamran
    
    On 2020-03-18, 7:03 AM, "Éric Vyncke via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
    
       
        
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        DISCUSS:
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        
        Thank you for addressing my previous comments (especially around the IPv6
        support).
        
        But, I am now balloting a DISCUSS because I-D.ietf-rtgwg-policy-model  MUST be
        a normative reference as it is referenced by the YANG modules of this document.
        I.e., this document cannot be published _BEFORE_ I-D.ietf-rtgwg-policy-model
        ... Else, it will be useless.
        
        Regards
        
        -éric
        
        
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        COMMENT:
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        
        Thank you for the work put into this document.
        
        I fully support Ben Kaduk's DISCUSS about IPv6 (about why IPv6 is in the
        extended section 6.1.2).  I would have balloted a DISCUSS if Ben haven't
        balloted before me.
        
        Also concerned about Suresh's question about the "rw ipv4 (or ipv6)" in section
        6.2.1. and 6.2.2. and other places. Thank you, though, for the IPv6 example in
        Appendix A.
        
        Answers to my COMMENTs below will be welcome,
        
        Regards,
        
        -éric
        == COMMENTS ==
        
        -- Section 4 --
        Why having the YANG subtrees for IPv4 and IPv6 different order of their
        subtrees in ietf-mpls-ldp/mpls-ldp/address-families/ipv[46] ?
        
        -- Section 5.1.2 --
        Another difference about IPv4 and IPv6 in the tree: IPv6 has an "enable" leaf
        but IPv4 does not. Why is that ?
        
        -- Section 5.2.1.1. --
        In the text "this document recommends an operator to pick a routable IPv4
        unicast address as an LSR Id", what is meant by "routable" ? Globally routable
        ? Domain routable ?
        
        Also, it is expected that design recommendations are done in a document about
        data model?

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status