IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2024 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7FAC151089; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NjB40XzMe0US; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A785C151073; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43055b43604so11790175e9.3; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 21:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728448556; x=1729053356; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lDPdGPcCB64a4TUJmtZvOrov0Exh9ICLPidGGxhxW14=; b=fWoC6RWtn1UoAF0cjGWEQ28zca6P4yJe8hO2WNCLECRLYFvblVsokizz+CT/p0uMg+ 0Z6gQJD42XzbEocOglQP7kAkqkrTsDaQ6bfRKw0vQqgaQ9VMJJMsJ8vpLOBBQyBgFcmR xXSUVGspkk6lmgW5F3edPCLCi/BE/DQnKueMCUW3ajc81nRkzp57SO34OZGd3A5IaVnH Hqc4CG46c1uCBXc01K3csM95XTJ3RMAfSq53PnnoCMGIiIMPGANJa5rJmY9pglTTbqCN hrvUIlUM4jB7lFHK6p7nvMV5fGODFzkE39LybQVgg2oNjtZTRMoKNEB3tdQ5wKhEJEDi tf3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728448556; x=1729053356; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lDPdGPcCB64a4TUJmtZvOrov0Exh9ICLPidGGxhxW14=; b=uEquhAjOkTOcet79LEcyf3krX9VCDjm3nRfrCY4Pwl3b1NFXuAe5UcCEwH70mNvdaB EYYpcaGs4Uxbq9uJZYZ/LuPY+4dlVxh9fIrVZ2il+vylXw8Zv7KdX2AT+nwjTLaU7ZaM CwFEf3CQz2KUPikh49xPuqit7NpmuSTFTdxtUja4bC5+ic2Cjs/96od5drS8suL2J59U W9XEWNWwDgI6r1kGhWkXGegBqrQJ7mlCXpPIxrz1w+mte1IC8DfUKcfA8VogdqohSASx uYk6zYdOE2J38rHRd4m1m4XHUfcLj7aO9nngtu0hhvrYdhZGkrWEz0snM1oS8WM3Ge3V 8gAA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUkVytICEmdllbLfLf1sahUsgf4k8t7pOWe8J6xIiP8AbDl99QHimL/8axCFiLj5B7jqno5zw==@ietf.org, AJvYcCVPPABEIs8ua9pqz+GVY4rY/9szvFMnEyYBjJMeClnz23TH5E8MVGEDXQjY//8WVu6i6M7O6UyGZ70o+Uo=@ietf.org, AJvYcCVTJG5Q6sw11fvFT1MuAC7P1w75HZpVD9au5JCvc8LWGmL6dWY6eKIOUScUFN0TXW6KbHHv6tNtF6NyzHOvOA8M+4aG96Y4RbgH@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yziv7HI+nGJqa8evyf8yVKKW1LYvd6czgqCLMjpSz9Vx8gXnIvN cjdmCyp7yomUAmbIwv297wgGrcYMTbYUx3+Of5KNiy3jcOTgENtbI/s1z/l+/VZ1AZ4mZYBg6Wx sJIr+2cUBDGJxESJDDctrEZ9oOEw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGh9GSrFw5tQXhejUSN1fll8OAodkuZ8Ky22drBRu4pNXEdzOkLv4RdEWWUxunXru1MQ1vKqn6mk6i93R60XUc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d01:b0:42c:bc22:e074 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-430d7487d86mr8336165e9.29.1728448555549; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 21:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BEZP281MB20085D267CFABD1474A4771898772@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CA+RyBmV+mErkBGqn=APs_Reuz+aG1=00H0ZehMbCdgj-RUAgMw@mail.gmail.com> <3215d88e87ec4f25b5edad2f138e63b1@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <3215d88e87ec4f25b5edad2f138e63b1@huawei.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 21:35:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW595kqod_qx83sM2Bb8E8q+q_L66-ySCC4tjkkO8i7=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002a8b72062403ca91"
Message-ID-Hash: QFSBT2M4BEA6GGLLYCH36OSLU5TOBVN2
X-Message-ID-Hash: QFSBT2M4BEA6GGLLYCH36OSLU5TOBVN2
X-MailFrom: gregimirsky@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "n.leymann@telekom.de" <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, MPLS Working Group <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/g-9w7XqcDx74PhpH8hqoWJDVjq8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Jie,
I responded to your note on the thread you've mentioned. It seems like you
are mixing the discussion with your company's product management with the
discussion of the optional extension of the MPLS data plane by MPLS WG.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, 21:14 Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Just realized that I should also reply to this thread…
>
>
>
> As being discussed in another thread about MPLS entropy, there are already
> several mechanisms for providing entropy in MPLS, and they have been
> deployed in production networks.
>
>
>
> Without explicit requirements from operators, it seems providing yet
> another option for MPLS entropy is not beneficial.
>
>
>
> Thus I do not support the adoption of this draft.
>
>
>
> -Jie
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2024 4:18 AM
> *To:* N.Leymann@telekom.de
> *Cc:* mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org;
> draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [mpls] Re: Working Group Adoption Poll on
> draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy
>
>
>
> The draft offers a practical use of MNA. The drafts is well-written and is
> very clear on the proposed mechanism. I support the adoption of the draft
> by the MPLS WG.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 7:05 AM <N.Leymann@telekom.de> wrote:
>
> Dear WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting draft-li-mpls-mna-entropy as
> a MPLS working group document.
>
>
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group
> mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
>
> Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support,
> especially if you think that the document
>
> should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
>
>
> Currently, there are no IPR disclosure against this document. All the
> authors/contributors have stated on
>
> the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs
> that relates to this document.
>
>
>
> This working group adoption poll ends October 16, 2024.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Nic (as MPLS WG co-chair)
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org
>
>

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status