[mpls] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 23:01 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150767649150.24836.6273623957373248953.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:01:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/gUGoUeWD-jCfZb_cUcHvWelmrWo>
Subject: [mpls] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I share Kathleen's concern. A related issue is the trust model: this allows one
endpoint to potentially learn a lot about the MPLS topology. Is that an issue?

[mpls] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf… Eric Rescorla