Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> Sat, 15 December 2012 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C221F8945 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkmwdXg9x9XM for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC53521F88C8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id za17so4133450obc.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=JXE2gXpFGXVEp5i+d/Ozysai75kvciGNTwGwS/BnY3c=; b=VXZ/48j3289oPSa5RI6wqOCAG8MFl1eiOEP4dvsAG1NEk2tFGLXgxvv6SHUyoHgmMf QGHzY1O2Fpnv9t0dbFsx/G7w0A7wcUYThE0Qyd8XHbS/gRuYtOPyhEBtQSgFQvdNK3Lx /yc+Qr8l3jNpHN/Jt0tK/V9Gbz9C7A/S/9Jsnpn2JJp6RdlZqdbf3wl+XhTbAkwGuj+9 p67u1Z71pi5dgVi2ytDiZEpNIWoq27UqESYMMarlANkHUfQopiqFQLEx/i7GEcpA3jcs A22Kp4WvFfutQ5HTNf/Qmel+QC2S/mF9umq7ItE9dtYfLdnfhpnczPEdm4KtCFC7QL4u iZrw==
Received: by 10.182.89.42 with SMTP id bl10mr6736626obb.27.1355557938436; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.69] (75-37-193-116.lightspeed.lsatca.sbcglobal.net. [75.37.193.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b3sm5019835obo.6.2012.12.14.23.52.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:17 -0800 (PST)
References: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu> <63E1EBC2-515C-4661-B038-94DED72295DE@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <63E1EBC2-515C-4661-B038-94DED72295DE@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <046500CE-059D-4471-A831-835F50C7D7AA@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405)
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:13 -0800
To: "S. Davari" <davarish@yahoo.com>
Cc: "draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:52:21 -0000

Support. 

On Dec 14, 2012, at 21:34, "S. Davari" <davarish@yahoo.com> wrote:

> It seems the authors are trying to bypass the NVO3 solution selection process by advancing the draft in MPLS WG.

That's completely uncalled for. If it's your opinion that this draft has a better fit in the NVO3 WG, just say so.

This draft is about MPLS and should be dealt with in the MPLS WG. That's my opinion, but I'm happy to defer to the WG chairs and ADs.

Kireeti