Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> Sat, 15 December 2012 07:52 UTC
Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C221F8945 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkmwdXg9x9XM for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC53521F88C8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id za17so4133450obc.31 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=JXE2gXpFGXVEp5i+d/Ozysai75kvciGNTwGwS/BnY3c=; b=VXZ/48j3289oPSa5RI6wqOCAG8MFl1eiOEP4dvsAG1NEk2tFGLXgxvv6SHUyoHgmMf QGHzY1O2Fpnv9t0dbFsx/G7w0A7wcUYThE0Qyd8XHbS/gRuYtOPyhEBtQSgFQvdNK3Lx /yc+Qr8l3jNpHN/Jt0tK/V9Gbz9C7A/S/9Jsnpn2JJp6RdlZqdbf3wl+XhTbAkwGuj+9 p67u1Z71pi5dgVi2ytDiZEpNIWoq27UqESYMMarlANkHUfQopiqFQLEx/i7GEcpA3jcs A22Kp4WvFfutQ5HTNf/Qmel+QC2S/mF9umq7ItE9dtYfLdnfhpnczPEdm4KtCFC7QL4u iZrw==
Received: by 10.182.89.42 with SMTP id bl10mr6736626obb.27.1355557938436; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.69] (75-37-193-116.lightspeed.lsatca.sbcglobal.net. [75.37.193.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b3sm5019835obo.6.2012.12.14.23.52.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:17 -0800 (PST)
References: <50CAEAD4.6000705@pi.nu> <63E1EBC2-515C-4661-B038-94DED72295DE@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <63E1EBC2-515C-4661-B038-94DED72295DE@yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <046500CE-059D-4471-A831-835F50C7D7AA@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405)
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:52:13 -0800
To: "S. Davari" <davarish@yahoo.com>
Cc: "draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-xu-mpls-in-udp@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make draft-xu-mpls-in-udp an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:52:21 -0000
Support. On Dec 14, 2012, at 21:34, "S. Davari" <davarish@yahoo.com> wrote: > It seems the authors are trying to bypass the NVO3 solution selection process by advancing the draft in MPLS WG. That's completely uncalled for. If it's your opinion that this draft has a better fit in the NVO3 WG, just say so. This draft is about MPLS and should be dealt with in the MPLS WG. That's my opinion, but I'm happy to defer to the WG chairs and ADs. Kireeti
- [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make dra… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Vivek Kumar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Nischal Sheth
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Puneet Agarwal
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Rogers, Josh
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Shane Amante
- [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS over U… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Adrian Farrel
- [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlying n… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] Discussion on how to transport MPLS ov… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… S. Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Xuxiaohu
- [mpls] MPLS over L2TP over UDP//re: poll to see i… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] MPLS client layer over an IGP underlyi… Lucy yong
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have support to make… Pat Thaler
- [mpls] Poll ended - poll to see if we have suppor… Loa Andersson