Re: [mpls] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-06

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD81E128BB6; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9W3HE67D5V6U; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5FC1200B9; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u19so87880805qta.3; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=8lHZ7w1IynKVAZmqGzKivUSKbmLrvsftxJMCI/mC64M=; b=u2W+xezFLRayPhJDIPLT68NzlptimhmQ/geyac1J/sLxbi5fH66U0aVVffuLtWfd2k Rz6xC9x9p48StxhGn3Zxo2niVy5f4DF/XzLjb55lCr0wvnUGZG+GbVayLskwuodzGteE idpL5evUOeJ+R8IwD1+Q0hEzAfHqq43KPpFmrKepEN3WuMDdnMBLp3NeHsZ3BGwVhGIm MeD6dRGTTtXJOomXyjuRw0NH2WyKqBMKGHmn4AE+6qCCf6frX2LLGKQQeM3+Ywr/PM9g lBRqm4dSDsOLYL09AUdat/YQ9vXJSIS3/ijqZfF6vlik0ywbJymREjjme14g1wkYE9aM HlLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8lHZ7w1IynKVAZmqGzKivUSKbmLrvsftxJMCI/mC64M=; b=lo0yPSW2BawNnR42JjrQB9/jYlPoyzodJgl9x+BhBZeidkAGjfrXklPFYLgngdhrnY KiVQkLitxW5qXFuRroPBCwSTgNCHcpTlo0q5FzzGr0hxy4mCXHoLaSx6Co9ylSvmBoh6 Oe5CK7uzUzBYvWi9/v/pro/hl3954rsGaDOcvVnR6yl9+Mm+wONkHT5pG/cRhdkhkxp1 lXMg8vv4GTJtUlXGwd0+2AzhdmQcXcoDfYRGIZzBWCs51xr2LCi1f1J+sVc3zny0G2Tb Sxc5TSWawem5QJQJeOcjz1x1Cg6wFajsRsd+gqBYb7k/61E5roD3MKLD336MpOEY6YJh wnOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDbAZ/fJe85sTzmjQV2rNS0NLLnXxEIV1LMAuqroMn0x8PQe/Ex 6Gq1+dcDC4tfT0HaNWcZnL4Q2zeJ4w==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.172 with SMTP id h41mr34520264qta.96.1496783772304; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.9.57 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <ba9d5fb2-81ba-63d7-b814-c94d154402dc@gmail.com>
References: <CABFReBq1xG4+qjS5roHDSgBaSSMd6dDA0au_FgKCKm9a0pSvOA@mail.gmail.com> <ba9d5fb2-81ba-63d7-b814-c94d154402dc@gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:16:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBoxM8fjbzFocB6LwmLT4z1-QBWSyP-6KyGwBESPnRTR7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: "bier@ietf.org" <bier@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11357a020dcb400551512178"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/hf8Zfco990Ju8JGEyqZwC2Lt-aM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-06
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:16:15 -0000

MPLS Chairs,

Inline:

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please could you clarify whether this document is being reviewed by the
> MPLS WG as part of this process?
>
Yes, MPLS WG review is our next step. The draft cleared WGLC in the BIER
WG, so we need your review before WG LC support before proceeding.

Thanks,
Greg
(BIER Chairs)

On 05/05/2017 23:58, Greg Shepherd wrote:
>
> At WG meeting, IETF97 in Chicago, we decided to move forward to WGLC for
> some of our docs. We learned that even once published the IESG has a
> process to change the track of the RFC if the WG makes the case to move the
> work from Informational to Standards track. The feedback from operators is
> that RFC status was more important than track, and we won't be able to meet
> our charter requirements to change track without deployment experience and
> operator support.
>
> This email starts a two week timer for feedback on the draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation/
>
> Please read and respond do this thread. EOWGLC - 20/5/17
>
> Thank you,
> Chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing listBIER@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BIER mailing list
> BIER@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bier
>
>