Re: [mpls] working adoption poll on g draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group,

The response to this adoption poll has been a bit low, I assume this
depends on that this depends on that it was done across the IETF
meeting in Berlin and was kind of drowned in the mail flood around
the meeting.

The poll has been extended to August 9 hoping that we will see further
responses.

/Loa

On 2016-07-19 11:21, Loa Andersson wrote:
>
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-chandra-mpls-ri-
> rsvp-frr as a MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([e-mail]) Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There is one IPR disclosure against either document..
>
> All the authors have stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
> unaware of any other IPRs that those that has been disclosed
>
> The MPLS-RT review had some comments about the relationship between
> this document and draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte. The authors
> of draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte has told the wg chairs that
> their draft is almost ready for working group adoption. It seems, given
> that one or both documents are accepted as wg denouements, that these
> issues are more efficiently resolved during working document process.
>
> The working group adoption poll ends August 2, 2016.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair