IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Thu, 05 May 2022 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41EFC157B33 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9-oq6cV8Gjv for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 19:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CDAC14F741 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 19:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d25so2538707pfo.10 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 May 2022 19:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=vf9jJIyh2Gs3jvGfM6jhfP6lzWNZ5hWoLUO1ZPAV9iY=; b=cExh0eB4YE07Le3AjRucZOOw5hDIqrX9yJVHvivwwbeWmHMOykzr/e6+LpVdxbxX5Z Y7LpP8/SaJm6gUgrtXbw9AKaisxIU/itEdtbnhkrzoFuErBmz7s8881uuOmXQj7WuS6I mKL/kL3Y+D0APBYqy1diBrH4x9jREA1CRuhITs2VyboHA46sK66oHT/waKsQibgmWu2S AJCB+xpjdQY1n18V95AemJG29e/bkhgGjDxWca/4EnTTKVfuAcybiuolN/kQHPsYsHEM Vp/tu1EOq9OZo8QDqCfSai7zhbTJirMiuegBV8DIjSBxryzVg8AoU6OiwZjZB03QPNwx 8pRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=vf9jJIyh2Gs3jvGfM6jhfP6lzWNZ5hWoLUO1ZPAV9iY=; b=zUxQP64MN9uvBYop+4WF5t1B0vYun2tGjwPqQ3PoL6h2RGJXFZai6ZY2mOf9cV6Gpz 0M0wS5bl1ZGuF3ZGxOYebBYKAQigvAwk5CzE4LopXpxEFJ0d5fZ2YUTUGyYgN33zuGl6 F6j/6xlzIZDo8GaQedwYR2EdTAtD1clp0BVy0+TzAbQnPFh4iJJadnyywEPGb9OwHIQR /+gTKuiKfXn39/fg8YvCWrU+lMZn0mcUMk2b0T+ouXVVs0K3QKAZVC2kHATD/OO246/o g9k7KZdXApwWYg1PdYKX8fnA/fu60mf5samJnusHOJ+jLYf2K7HAqDpISVLYAnxuCr5N pNMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DLIAFuDwr7Unr9t7yS7epiVL1g8VxXZIVQnQjC55H2zKKnbnX NNWZAj5ESdWiWqc0tUBTwds=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxw/BEAkc4ns8+cnATVYwdzTXpvIP88harDFf1tcqx55SJYjK0Em+ukwUtpSFzq0IWLgWLeUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4722:0:b0:3a9:fd43:fce9 with SMTP id u34-20020a634722000000b003a9fd43fce9mr20354919pga.620.1651717090808; Wed, 04 May 2022 19:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18-20020a17090a199200b001cd4989ff4asm225124pji.17.2022.05.04.19.18.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 May 2022 19:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <DD62DC4D-C858-436C-B4A7-91A31F1DD0E8@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC9ABA1A-9302-4793-8D9A-671D0CB16911"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 19:18:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <d3c84493e63648ffaa6c902712c0739e@huawei.com>
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, John E Drake <jdrake=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
References: <6cc272447d2f4c779e85d5c42d3b3c6c@huawei.com> <8623637D-A32E-47A4-B5FC-4D2CF40BEDD1@tony.li> <6199e0e886f9437c95ef9b70719b00ec@huawei.com> <BCFD3F4A-36D6-47C2-B907-FC40B402F97C@tony.li> <3fb1f261ddff48deb0c2ea083cdbd16f@huawei.com> <6B96F21B-9331-4FA8-AD7B-84A4CA8B6FAB@tony.li> <903c57a48280454091495673ec2fe275@huawei.com> <BD5C1BE7-4633-4B51-BAC1-B2AE1C537F36@tony.li> <ad6b8c42b0aa4880b9dee02516f5e46f@huawei.com> <F5BB2CEB-CC8C-4E71-A2E7-B4212878C3B1@tony.li> <aa9c4b913d844410b2af90c8db78c194@huawei.com> <BY3PR05MB8081937B52E657713E8293BFC7ED9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <a29c96be774845e582a66700d2264f7b@huawei.com> <e986565c98c24cadb858ca4abf6dbbfb@huawei.com> <BY3PR05MB8081A6A725740415356DB2EBC7FA9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <eb8d7858982d449e94511f81eb9913c8@huawei.com> <BY3PR05MB808117E628EC6487362E6275C7FD9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <ded09bb6ec864465982f5e025937c8e0@huawei.com> <BY3PR05MB80817C746EF6621F80730082C7FC9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <41561193f7d448ff96129d6da20e49a2@huawei.com> <535C336B-545F-4E0E-A9DF-990FC0AB53CC@juniper.net> <d3c84493e63648ffaa6c902712c0739e@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/hsgbd10OB8FROepIQk_U3QdsyaA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerns about ISD
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 02:18:14 -0000


> On May 4, 2022, at 5:42 PM, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> It does not make sense to me to create a new mechanism as ISD in operators’ network, while not using existing mature BSID.
> There is no sign the reinvented wheel could be better.


Hi Tianran,

BSID assumes that SR is in use.  What if it isn’t?

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email