[mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 18 September 2020 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF783A0CCA; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160045780223.10323.3860037409010442840@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:36:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/hxVVNqueixAuvpx2hCzxk9cLyUE>
Subject: [mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:36:42 -0000
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I counted a total of three normative requirements in this document, none of them earth-shattering, and wonder if this could be changed to Informational and perhaps the important requirements moved into drafts that provide interoperable specs. ISTM that asking implementers to implement both this and a draft that describes an actual protocol is unnecessarily heavyweight.
- [mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-m… Martin Duke via Datatracker
- Re: [mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Duke