[mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 18 September 2020 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF783A0CCA; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, tsaad.net@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160045780223.10323.3860037409010442840@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:36:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/hxVVNqueixAuvpx2hCzxk9cLyUE>
Subject: [mpls] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:36:42 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-framework/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I counted a total of three normative requirements in this document, none of
them earth-shattering, and wonder if this could be changed to Informational and
perhaps the important requirements moved into drafts that provide interoperable
specs. ISTM that asking implementers to implement both this and a draft that
describes an actual protocol is unnecessarily heavyweight.