IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] 答复: Solicit Opinions on Definition of MPLS Global Label

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 04 November 2015 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52461B2E8A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 04:40:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKTxaKF_jRao for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 04:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228EF1B2E88 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 04:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.11.2.82] (y255183.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [118.243.255.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 602CE1801556; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:39:56 +0100 (CET)
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA63EA4@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5639C761.2030802@pi.nu> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA642F5@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <5639FC97.3050000@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 21:39:51 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8CA642F5@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/iNjTIsO1wxtvUvGbRjCBJDbA4oY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] 答复: Solicit Opinions on Definition of MPLS Global Label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:40:02 -0000

Robin,

On 2015-11-04 18:28, Lizhenbin wrote:
> 2. For entropy label/flow label, though it maybe calculated by the ingress router
      locally, all nodes along the path have the universal understanding 
that its usage
      is for ECMP.

That an LSR understands that the EL is for ECMP has nothing to do with
the EL, but is a property bound to the ELI. The EL is in no way global,
it is local for the label stack.

By redefining concepts it is possible to "prove" anything.

/Loa

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status