IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 07 October 2024 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A69C1840DC; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 07:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zJ-kB1NTF3w; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 07:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31161C169436; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 07:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37cdbcb139cso3544810f8f.1; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 07:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728311487; x=1728916287; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xAIeC0EsKxBqspALMQnFT6beuIMyP05FVBWe54VpZV8=; b=AHuAxCo8FzxoqErLWwyOmXqH6/yjOgmalR9xSuioOXzzrW7eWYn7PJTtBugXeOLk+s b4vUHKt4z5EApJcm0cnhP2Hv21mVIIIOLKylCHARkjivwQMyeXWR/R/7/kYXDim2pfqO qpErbUNgE6il2g4dHikOXtOEf1n8qpa8uM4O6nZ1vRHxOfnOY6o91Kbp6UxNquxxOIry PVkCk/ya2J8bKNZphwva+0s6Z8fi2D0jKzLRZZLQ4y8GDImPKzbAZxx2W5t5j9HoT7KS GkJNjkDOGYhSjYqkxNQAskQfFc1gkGqew/fyVtmPY4e06evyW0XUcT73bYCSndv/eg1M Epyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728311487; x=1728916287; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xAIeC0EsKxBqspALMQnFT6beuIMyP05FVBWe54VpZV8=; b=UOIlB3mJxBFvfXWEWW3v3nujqFe8Dj+O2ErqQVVor66zNdkBeKHtGyZhyYf+o42Kh+ eOH2itdYBfiWxPdtQSasLXDQCmgDFZrJtVlLpEQvEgFJpVm7RWQg1QFMEWAxbRLzDUEg 5Vo4mSItl5xVL1ya0kNAV8Nzb7joaHSLXgik5AEr1BMH38s/3+RefYR/PgwneshoFf73 NHXOsOY2qZK1J2rJbVHhOvdZHFuDRLrv9GP1HTrye+jEMZn8HRrVeenbYQ4pdgS+blY4 fe5IKkX0j1wrM9s5mA51HX9kcnTHJbT/Rrf/dFBn3f67xVErFW60iJKYiUj9R2dFa05n dWsw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUggOc+TW2m9lL9PAdG12zdxne3GLCW+WJdDVlG+n+YeL274J/THXQmzcRvEiFfI/+jZhl40w==@ietf.org, AJvYcCV3c+L75uy4vNPz9n22+xoiWWIsBbJUzKskzH3kmj+QVJqT9kS5HZeXBmmNTt0RLUr6s0AIqpzhmxPP/Ng=@ietf.org, AJvYcCVKwRxv+6iz+Z2S0ZkUvE+bGGW7rzHp2FkrcWS5z0WJburp/FoiMDwjAVTDYZK3wb6dYzdLp0pP28+FODjpHmyyw5+5+lJ9ag==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxuUN84XA4F2ntT5qD4C1iXjepcMCeZkH8SporL+7Bgdm2IsSfZ 0w8Q8YA7AjIxwo4fOj9hHKeh3xrTI+EtUiIoVmuP7y4N/zZXq3DZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHa/uMcFmuQeBYuMG3AMhYamT5cBjHpltFzBhznpr7AWAwS1h5PJxgA1j65i0+7O3AZjzQ/Ig==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5f84:0:b0:37c:cdbf:2cbe with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37d0e7699c9mr8365091f8f.23.1728311486287; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 07:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a02:8012:7161:0:2413:a52a:72b8:3adb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42f86a0a7c0sm95002765e9.7.2024.10.07.07.31.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 07:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <483A0E76-6ED7-4872-B633-2AA99476D7EB@braindump.be>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:31:15 +0100
Message-Id: <56A17B0F-1BDC-4FA1-9478-A9E2CB83B8B4@gmail.com>
References: <483A0E76-6ED7-4872-B633-2AA99476D7EB@braindump.be>
To: IJsbrand Wijnands <ice-ietf@braindump.be>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21G93)
Message-ID-Hash: QIDFQFYHFTIMUEEA2WCVDRZAFG4S4LDW
X-Message-ID-Hash: QIDFQFYHFTIMUEEA2WCVDRZAFG4S4LDW
X-MailFrom: stewart.bryant@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls@ietf.org, MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/iS1fiuM7y2I9dn5389QxMVQgsJ0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

I have been thinking the same.

Hop by hop changes of this magnitude are a big deal.

The safest option would be to run it as experimental protocol on an ESPL. That way we can learn more about the design and its properties and if we need to make a change we have plenty more ESPLs

If the experiment succeeds we can move to PS with a BSPL.

Stewart 

> On 7 Oct 2024, at 10:13 AM, IJsbrand Wijnands <ice-ietf@braindump.be> wrote:
> 
> Dear MPLS WG,
> 
> Given the nature of the changes to the MPLS architecture for supporting ISD in the data-plane, and the various concerns that have raised on the list, I believe that this document should be on the experimental track.
> 
> I do not support publishing this document on standards track.
> 
> Thx,
> 
> Ice.
> 
>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 15:25, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear WG,
>> 
>> This email starts a two-week Working Group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr. This is the 2nd WG last call for this document.
>> Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>> 
>> Please send your comments to the mpls WG mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
>> If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.
>> 
>> Note, currently there are 5 IPR disclosures against this document at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr
>> 
>> This poll runs until October 8, 2024.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status