IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Mon, 31 May 2021 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418B3A2338; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsWysrJOI4mm; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89953A2332; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id c2so10767502ilo.11; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=N5Bo+wmoDWAxfN6/U3vW0v3S06unbCi4TfjDaCq1Lhc=; b=K19melMEiUA8qdG6fFHwmi+SSKZ6BdLbPIdjwkTCAzvmyJF7NvDbWp810vwk+eowWf g+kuFleakjeWuKuB8hG58CQYHL9DaDo4Q8BHHcm/LXLvByKOsgz1bMJdHQm7dlNYIgWj dGZnmDmJJfcLCt4C+ZC6Ek3nRkDsV10kGUiT0oroShdotuXvPyU+mhC2V1gnUfitoCMi MhTb2oak8sfNKH8wXmniRdpp/P9Dkxhfs3cjA1fk5c9PL5urHAqdIr6T6diTFnplpBR+ B4gEoe9slBdid9TWD730rlzyXYOzyF9f026ohQI8xwuqdc/Dyqe9CWTslj3fJnM5rpTc sAJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=N5Bo+wmoDWAxfN6/U3vW0v3S06unbCi4TfjDaCq1Lhc=; b=sDeC0V/vDHOsznFbAVu0gc62g/rdz/R3V9WeYsMDX/TUDbCu/wr2AXoidl+BQeYClO r+acSsc6dzQYyEs9aPgHQ/zSuBdKoKXL8MzyvI4bht5XWvLFutqSoAKdcmS/qqfWjHX6 7Ydux1klt5wLjqaWjR1fgvL1ahdA7fKV+pV4sjFV/nVtUTKYERFLUdAZXYkl3dthXbBa Y7nN1SJPfERTj74FW7YkVD70C/GurKt3KDBZw3UiiZktgK/uv6lEr07e+7UoFPYukXNH 84CwSuguzbqxeW1RCrEiAXjTzQ5HxdkndNB7+tB/eW5XMbc26PThi9mxBJxQMKgjHHKp rKzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/hEM1XoRzxVzn7Fsv0Q/iCICIZZ8vsholq6lnzS/PqzeMBvgd /T0kjP17Jv+pMxjTQuUMgcQiGibyZ7s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwjrRYexuLMKtyaXvp92DoPjJIkl5hhl4Ezj9P2HkUzw8y2PNW3gFxELtvW27ecdr/TBOSew==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c7d3:: with SMTP id g19mr19369635ilk.144.1622488570941; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm7940228ion.18.2021.05.31.12.16.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 May 2021 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec@ietf.org" <draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec@ietf.org>
CC: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Thread-Index: AQHXVk93PCKokEymgUmioOObhpgFEKr99ejX
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:16:08 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB21506A2274D0685E01E742BDFC3F9@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM5PR1901MB2150B3A756CE9770944C43E4FC3F9@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR1901MB2150B3A756CE9770944C43E4FC3F9@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR1901MB21506A2274D0685E01E742BDFC3F9DM5PR1901MB2150_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/iVkhXd_eGXfvd3COZ5Te2FSETLs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:16:19 -0000

Working Group, authors,

This is a start of an IPR poll in preparation for the WG adoption for draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
Currently, there are no IPR disclosures against draft-rathi-mpls-egress-tlv-for-nil-fec.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Regards,
Tarek/MPLS WG Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email