Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 10:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94981B3E57; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 02:36:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1TjvxoKiSv4q; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 02:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5190C1B3E58; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 02:36:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CJR99627; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:08:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([10.125.30.107]) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.201.5.168]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:08:46 +0000
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
Thread-Index: AQHRdrqHn/k0PnNEEEyoYoUECiJHJp9NtEyQ
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:08:45 +0000
Message-ID: <91E3A1BD737FDF4FA14118387FF6766B1560A6C1@lhreml504-mbs>
References: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56DA9B26.8050800@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.144.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown, refid=x_failed, ip=unknown, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32, mode=multiengine
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090205.56DD5987.00A3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 18fef4d69e04a6f564f834d305000fd3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/itQ9q9OnXf6N0EOUEfixN6pP3FE>
Cc: "draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org" <draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:36:21 -0000

Yes, support (as co-author)

Italo

-----Original Message-----
From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] 
Sent: sabato 5 marzo 2016 09:39
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org
Subject: Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

Working Group,

This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps- updates as an MPLS working group document.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

There are no IPR disclosures against this document.

All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.

Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has stated that it will be deployed once it is available.

The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.

/Loa

MPLS wg co-chair.
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64