Re: [mpls] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1435/

Loa and Scott,

Regarding draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd, the datatracker is misleading.
It’s not been in AUTH48 for 99 days, it’s been in the RFC Editor’s queue
for 99 days. I expect AUTH48 to complete shortly, editorial corrections are
complete and we're just waiting on all of the authors to respond. So please
remove the “for 99 days” from its entry in the list.

Thanks,
Andy

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> This is the list of active IDs, if we want to use it, please feel free
> to do so.
>
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is strictly not a mpls-tp ID, but since there seems
> to be interest it could be included as "WG Document".
>
> /Loa
>
>
> On 2016-02-13 02:19, Huub van Helvoort wrote:
>
>> Hello Lou,
>>
>> You wrote:
>>
>> - Is it worth providing a list of RFCs and wg IDs, perhaps in an
>>> attachment?  And add " We would appreciate any comments you may have
>>> on the active Working Group  documents."
>>>
>>> Lou
>>>
>>
>> That is a good idea.
>> Here are some candidates for that list, I think thet the ITU will be
>> interested
>> in their status:
>>
>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection
>> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr
>>
>> Best regards, Huub.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>