Re: [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> Thu, 03 November 2016 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39F129660; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6QeP5nToXK8; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076B112950B; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CUL40185; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:29:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.175) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 14:29:11 +0000
Received: from DFWEML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.178]) by dfweml701-cah.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:29:07 -0700
From: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
To: "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00
Thread-Index: AQHSNdbxqovpH1S/M0ui/wYWAHL6uaDHupQA//+LfxCAAH+UAP//izag
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:29:06 +0000
Message-ID: <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EFD1@dfweml501-mbx>
References: <AM2PR07MB09943987D6E27931F8C7CF3EF0A30@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EF32@dfweml501-mbx> <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D48B5BB53@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EF66@dfweml501-mbx> <B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B775ADDB@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <B9FEE68CE3A78C41A2B3C67549A96F48B775ADDB@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.254.206]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD007863908F0EFD1dfweml501mbx_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.581B49B8.0202, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 757543bd283f5f15f63d24868614daf9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/jPcH_mVi3EsAP5JGmreOm3bznMk>
Subject: Re: [mpls] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:29:20 -0000

IMHO we do not need both global and action RPC. The latter is more elegant but essentially the same as the former.

Igor

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org); mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Igor, this is correct.
But if I remember well last weekly tunnel model discussion, action proposal to support stateless solution is still in alternative to a normal RPC.
I guess in the new module Tarek has already created "arrangement" for both.

Thanks
Sergio


From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Igor Bryskin
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:49 PM
To: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) <michael.scharf@nokia.com>; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) <ccamp@ietf.org>; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org) <teas@ietf.org>; mpls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Michael,

Yang 1.1 action is a form of RPC.

Igor

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 9:45 AM
To: Igor Bryskin; Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>); pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>); mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

We have discussed this before. From an implementer's perspective, the two clean solutions to the problem seem to either stateful "compute-only" tunnels or a stateless RPC.

Michael


From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Igor Bryskin
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:34 PM
To: Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>); pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>); mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: [ALU] [mpls]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Hi,

>From the draft:

6.    YANG Model for requesting Path Computation


   Work on extending the TE Tunnel YANG model to support the need to
   request path computation has recently started also in the context of
   the [TE-TUNNEL<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00#ref-TE-TUNNEL>] draft.

   It is possible to request path computation by configuring a
   "compute-only" TE tunnel and retrieving the computed path(s) in the
   LSP(s) Record-Route Object (RRO) list as described in [TE-TUNNEL<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00#ref-TE-TUNNEL>].

   This is a stateful solution since the state of each created
   "compute-only" TE tunnel needs to be maintained and updated, when
   underlying network conditions change.

   The need also for a stateless solution, based on an RPC, has been
   recognized.


   The YANG model to support stateless RPC is for further study.





IB>> Please, note, that in the TE Tunnel model we consider the COMPUTE_AND_FORGET mode. We also consider the concept of path computation action to be defined under the TE tunnel node. All this is to facilitate stateless path computations.

Cheers,
Igor