Re: [mpls] 答复: poll on draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02

"Shahram Davari" <davari@broadcom.com> Mon, 20 December 2010 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D193A685C; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:47:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.225
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UZGo-UstIf5U; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MMS3.broadcom.com (mms3.broadcom.com [216.31.210.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA653A6856; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by MMS3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:49:52 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: B55A25B1-5D7D-41F8-BC53-C57E7AD3C201
Received: from SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.130]) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.232]) with mapi; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:49:03 -0800
From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:49:02 -0800
Thread-Topic: [mpls] 答复: poll on draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02
Thread-Index: AcugGgbKTVKwa3gWS42SrkUbaqVnZQAW/eQg
Message-ID: <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6941A693BC0@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <4D0B5321.2050508@pi.nu> <OF3021B6AC.237EBBCD-ON482577FF.002A48F2-482577FF.002AA9AA@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF3021B6AC.237EBBCD-ON482577FF.002A48F2-482577FF.002AA9AA@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 61117ADA0IO6063663-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD6941A693BC0SJEXCHCCR02co_"
Cc: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-bounces@ietf.org" <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] 答复: poll on draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:47:22 -0000

Hi,

I think this draft does not comply to the MPLS-TP Framework RFC 5921, because it can create overlapping MEGs, which is not allowed by RFC 5921. Based on this RFC only MEPs can generate OAM messages and there can only be 2 MEPs per LSP.


“When considering SPMEs, it is important to consider that the
   following properties apply to all MPLS-TP MEGs (regardless of
   whether they instrument LSPs, SPMEs or MS-PWs):






Busi et al.             Expires June 16, 2011                [Page 15]

Internet-Draft OAM Framework for MPLS-based Transport    December 2010


   o They can be nested but not overlapped, e.g. a MEG may cover a
     path segment of another MEG, and may also include the
     forwarding engine(s) of the node(s) at the edge(s) of the
     path segment. However when MEGs are nested, the MEPs and MIPs
     in the nested MEG are no longer part of the encompassing MEG.

“

Thanks,
Shahram


From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of wei.hongbo@zte.com.cn
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 11:42 PM
To: Loa Andersson
Cc: Ross Callon; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] 答复: poll on draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02


Yes/Support.

Best regards,
steven



Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
发件人:  mpls-bounces@ietf.org

2010-12-17 20:10

收件人

"mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>

抄送

主题

[mpls] poll on draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02







All,

this is to start a "two week" working group poll on making
draft-boutros-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-02
an mpls wg document.

Please send your comments to the mpls@ietf.org mailing list.

Since this is across the holidays the poll ends on January 6th.

/Loa
--


Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
                                             +46 767 72 92 13
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls





--------------------------------------------------------

ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.