IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Sun, 01 March 2020 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09A73A0A47; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 10:01:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J9QqIst-3zxm; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 10:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr660098.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.66.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896B33A0A45; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 10:01:08 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=AyPqJgIlh6Egbf8jRPHipAvto12WRrboWoPN9QhNr0kyxTtQebWhNxyQ64yK2W8oWNjPBX10bUe5y/fyQsWq+c6BJUodqXk/Mu+V1GgXlcPqlL0oNUnADQpEKFao82yrld3diH4yC01ErCXFTLzDYX0pZjd6mqgchZX18AzIfbdd0WOnn4BvRhlm6YWfsUG2bhLEaD7RjCt72Svg0AIcGMT4v4y72Y8Hn+ZxyZZ7oNvLtN/yV1kN8BTK6V+9ZSgu7jqkDju2SmPH46TNbRzLgrrEN+1li5dIWQfWifyD+tx+ojWGS7NOM3k5cN1XVjHHKRaNllUawThjpBuzvzLSXw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=4pNWy1bwfRUgIgOpXOW3NZwgc6weUTaHrtRyWIKpwZE=; b=j9dmSGA9/FckJRm2ZItn7cRDLIhRIjiEmd8nL5s9XYjhd+d/QLcK3MsxwGL2GvOHdV0IDhT2HfsYhSlyZpahunVcAsVIWx9zKIJ2QRS/b+D16qg+OhIcqEfhBco4erGcr50zkLh4YyBZ/5Jf9g7O3iV4K23dRYzyqQY3PQ/CwCVXovRDm/7OJvGYHPV2K3wj+6jUZK2l41s0QmLReI7Y2d9uwLPZO1fm3s/sHIxLp1zsLMvuJ5vendEgFvb/uqYARvgS7NFTLWlMd8S6wCBi/ZfrQzpFg/IPbWfGvfnPOIBD11P3cGqY21YEANvNvTtce6vxUGSKI0tc+dh/6t50Tw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kaloom.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=kaloom.com; dkim=pass header.d=kaloom.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=4pNWy1bwfRUgIgOpXOW3NZwgc6weUTaHrtRyWIKpwZE=; b=HPKZ1SrFiRjEKUufXBLR6QXVWRoHnOdjl+2Zxkw4WhCZDqLunTcuu+6t37woQ1QClJG9hjbU4R3swS3oE/5xjedHz557jy6O0ZAij/FqoYuJ5VlrXhjESsl4SQRh7OUkHXnMlnL48yT/inAXMu+YwOH9hZK2CyzXhHk/rbMdaXs=
Received: from QB1PR01MB3219.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.84.225) by QB1PR01MB2323.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.87.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.18; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 18:01:05 +0000
Received: from QB1PR01MB3219.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::88eb:95a3:1188:b54a]) by QB1PR01MB3219.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::88eb:95a3:1188:b54a%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Sun, 1 Mar 2020 18:01:04 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated rev -08 posted [Re: [mpls] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]
Thread-Index: AQHV7fE8HjQl60NxIEWto8/dnKm0h6g0Ct0A
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 18:01:04 +0000
Message-ID: <006FF228-2569-4947-ACB1-A2D2F9A0F778@kaloom.com>
References: <A06BF470-7C02-4045-A1F1-693F8CC6327D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A06BF470-7C02-4045-A1F1-693F8CC6327D@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [49.207.136.90]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fe7b9597-c738-47d7-d547-08d7be0a82ce
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: QB1PR01MB2323:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <QB1PR01MB2323BEC8202A6DC9F88C04EEB4E60@QB1PR01MB2323.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 0329B15C8A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(186003)(4744005)(66946007)(2906002)(2616005)(76116006)(91956017)(6486002)(6506007)(36756003)(53546011)(6512007)(4326008)(81166006)(8936002)(86362001)(508600001)(81156014)(66556008)(66476007)(5660300002)(26005)(71200400001)(8676002)(54906003)(55236004)(64756008)(33656002)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:QB1PR01MB2323; H:QB1PR01MB3219.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: DQmMW2hKAWQukrPD2gL22efDw36guAZ+wAKQJ1tFnS9Bu6Y8mlw8u87Rlg5fOncn0I6TIUjNGWjAV5Zi8CzSPaBpIF7DyFB0EH0NEkWl6aTDbZJIYa/MGMQzm1JHrawbZYiSICeLQylZ1oKQwNstF2nKliMvfPYG8oHZdFIHgwJRLMIljRcBgpcdKsT4q8+2h6SEpkFB3DGIhoI/dpD8ZObnqhL1V7tufeVQlGswhW3NzjQAo+3fRvMRiB+SBJMCSPaGu8W8L5JtcVoFC2VAwMj/Tx76nTJ+sQXQROLH1HFuy+mx2XhbIkoU7Ti2GLU0NhUwBHwR5K9OCurWIKLTjT2fbwLBO8UMtIEsKUW9WQPV3mr3vEGhvTt2EgIsfIANkEV2gHwzpRfWNQA9gJsQbKbJHLnLYw8Jm/GiKvu7D6lF3BIVy6ahdovPOSwVOBWs
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Amb/jEDlPBcM1Sjs2Q+Pci5dAYGFUuB1JdHba9wLui2ybHPenHXwIm9ar1Cp39t4Qxo04eDG0GMDXujMcRHJFtPz2k6/dCsMoqAwS2yDeJRJQfqY7gQlILoTWgSHaZF2PYHRW1KSZdcCdU9vrwU09w==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1D857F1D2A7EA945B08B48F81AAF43B6@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fe7b9597-c738-47d7-d547-08d7be0a82ce
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2020 18:01:04.9338 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: XGvGe9c8hmIbxQkrlwg1NWiYLK8fVunNqS43s/LtOvVd7/wQ0wBQr6+2yQhU0Zim6keIlNcFfW6/44dRGa1+EQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: QB1PR01MB2323
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/k3DrCASb9R4DoT72H4ygGzQvdXI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Updated rev -08 posted [Re: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-07: (with COMMENT)]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 18:01:12 -0000

Thanks Kamran. I looked over the draft and these changes work for me.

Regards
Suresh

> On Feb 27, 2020, at 11:40 PM, Kamran Raza (skraza) <skraza=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Suresh, Thanks for your review and comments.
> We have posted a new rev -08 that takes care of your comments and comments from other rIESG eviewers.
> On behalf of authors, please see further inline [skraza]:    
> 
> 
> On 2019-12-04, 11:13 AM, "mpls on behalf of Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" <mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    COMMENT:
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    I kind of figured out how this should work but is this formulation used in
>    Figures 10,11 and 13 something well defined? I have not seen this before and a
>    reread of RFC8340 did not help either
> 
>    +--ro ipv4 (or ipv6)
> 
> [skraza]: Fixed. Added text to highlight that similar tree exists for ipv6 as well.
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email