[mpls] how does it work if ....

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Wed, 17 March 2021 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8043A0D91 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qzgsiItDZnO for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu []) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365063A0D98 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (unknown []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D857032A1F4; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:18:28 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <1c87c917-5860-8efe-c640-7bd5cd548190@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:18:25 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kHUOrnmqmMNANR6gWlDBnbGQbrI>
Subject: [mpls] how does it work if ....
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:18:40 -0000


I'm looking at your slides from the joint meeting, in particular slide 
#3, where you say at thye bottom:

   "Corollary: such labels MUST NOT reach the top of stack (by popping
    labels above them)"

How is that backwards compatible.

If you  have an old LSR, that don't know to look at the bSPL or eSPL 
underneath the top label. I assume that the top label will be swapped 
and the packet forwarded.

What is the pen-ultimate LSR is "old" and just pop the top label, how 
can the PE sort this out?


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64