IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Sat, 28 September 2024 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45297C14F6A7; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9_4Oc3VOpBT; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E276C14F617; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b5affde14so4311895ad.3; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727538845; x=1728143645; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z8TvQRWN4F2SFYvx7bw6LlmY4VNc31BwMKJkQnPNUVU=; b=TEw0hCtTFipqYPcxf59lJ3jRI7xRmyFI8UbvIaTOVuObZ/zERf8/UKAWcvf0xE0TQf yA7AYYY6bGvByLgex7Tx1W75phwMqQ0nDugxQ+GvSFLy276Ay0bCvloFh+Io718YDWLs l5jtwOtOvRZFF0a4uMA6BmEOwzeuZmgQcpWLX4nufvPCY2TfJBsdCnELeR9TY4KJPYPv 31HtAiSxB7fO5udcVl8Zi+iFL/TLEMbLse5IYNbMP1kQasA6QiA9iSaUF5rFT11ZQXJm cJUMmItn2/kFirMsNELvR8YWFvc2ENlW6IT25mNwXO8JzwtyujanB9EU0BvRt0bZ9ak3 q8+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727538845; x=1728143645; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=z8TvQRWN4F2SFYvx7bw6LlmY4VNc31BwMKJkQnPNUVU=; b=vTYSotsmee+xlNtKcUAYt7Yl27V74VY+tvXcTqFbgvvqZUqVxY8Plba8IElnPXs+ib 5Spwu8EGVKkKuMKnJZIVnLzWaK+e2FUXOXQNgj2LVd50thEK8vjjWkFQHCsBdhUXZc+I ZHoPYRu8QC7I+I+z06dzyel5cLvVcCWNYLsl+Jy7SWJhSZ5+XT8/m+xXePWKLadTLDPA HrXKFRivsOuYt8tY89nnuSOqV7rOk2TtvmkNelREpsHfpU8MsVAizqlT9CM5tWQGDvad +nV+QTznt+syAgOVXCD8BYwbem4Q1EASNUJxRFdmxBgRefyWuJFDUj9w52w26ZQEQ5Zn aDJA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVlcxbyhZWaRaI+cnihjpqmLonnev5tcACzMuHcvobc7i0HYe00+KET8It3kMETYcGcXGtr3g==@ietf.org, AJvYcCVpjSjRVztb+lVpIxIE2sHCqmoPn8KfhjgAOApsF3/suENEOCL3hUp6Al5WK42na4f44uDwZjGKAdqBF6QQgPmKovSX8jtEXA==@ietf.org, AJvYcCW6gothMKhE7QDLIRUdIfQ+W7bb8tXoXNwiX9hw5Zb+N1HQx5ALEPL8hooJznjPQ3BwqnXdufDWb5SKnZo=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxVT1cFBfTjQ0k5J83oySu70HXOpkByT06ivBAy1Y4DUCKjizy qE9ckcAVctfs5uciLOJNzwRWV6bXn6mZ3SEkZjF2X24NVtxfv0N/uptjAg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFCWKa7xQ1LBSfJSjkl4gGD3YzlfCJGImLaFZxcuYz9RzNE7Dd1eFF1I0N7xODbqO3wMZNeWA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:124a:b0:1fb:68a2:a948 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b367d9225mr119219725ad.15.1727538844807; Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-20b37e50c2esm28507915ad.235.2024.09.28.08.54.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3818.100.11.1.3\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <cfd1a5c7-8be2-4627-af10-d4e029d07f72@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:53:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FA0907EC-4BC8-4F68-9B74-7A45716834FA@tony.li>
References: <DS0PR19MB65014515D511B396E79BA36FFCF82@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <LV8P220MB1914BBB4896362040615CAB2FC6F2@LV8P220MB1914.NAMP220.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <5f5db9a20d8e4b47b5515b686e834227@huawei.com> <FE99024D-D8D6-49CB-950A-393151743A0E@tony.li> <cfd1a5c7-8be2-4627-af10-d4e029d07f72@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3818.100.11.1.3)
Message-ID-Hash: AY4MK3PXH6WQFLGRAZFA3SLN3PIXDU3N
X-Message-ID-Hash: AY4MK3PXH6WQFLGRAZFA3SLN3PIXDU3N
X-MailFrom: tony1athome@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kP7pMM7QzGi3S34TpVAyjYMkpoc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

[WG chair hat: off]

Hi Loa,

>> but more importantly the MPLS WG does not have an implementation requirement.
> 
> I'm a bit at loss why that is "more important".


Because it is not a challenge to progressing the document.


> Has it been demonstrated that the problem the problems that the existing implementation had was dependent on the Tofino architecture, and did not depend on the specification itself?


I have already made the claim that the proposal is implementable on other architectures.

Tony

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status