IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 07 May 2024 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF3AC14F603; Tue, 7 May 2024 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIDCfvvpEozH; Tue, 7 May 2024 02:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B33C14F6B2; Tue, 7 May 2024 02:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4VYXgr5JXFz8XrS1; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:15:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app04.zte.com.cn ([10.40.12.64]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 4479Eji1081539; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:15:12 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 7 May 2024 17:15:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 17:15:15 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc6639f123226-db295
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240507171515536n-ZlZIh771595Av3VsLkG@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <BEZP281MB20088433D0354C29599DBC5B98112@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: BEZP281MB20088433D0354C29599DBC5B98112@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 4479Eji1081539
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6639F148.002/4VYXgr5JXFz8XrS1
Message-ID-Hash: VKILS2JAPEJZY2M5BOO5SAH7QPEVW7R3
X-Message-ID-Hash: VKILS2JAPEJZY2M5BOO5SAH7QPEVW7R3
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kemVgukm1PSxvjCIbTViR6e86eU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

I support progressing this document to publication.
One comment to the authors, it seems more friendly to the reader if the TLV definition, not just a reference, can be added for Figure 1.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min

Original


From: N.Leymann@telekom.de <N.Leymann@telekom.de>
To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org <draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org>;
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年04月23日 14:45
Subject: [mpls] WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

 

Dear WG,

This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd:
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-bfd/

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.

Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.

This poll runs until the 8th of May 2024.

Thank you,
Nic (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status