Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 30 January 2016 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163741B3746 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:29:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQAvDkPq53Yt for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:29:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7421B3744 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:29:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (unknown [49.149.162.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62FE718013CB; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:29:08 +0100 (CET)
To: mpls@ietf.org, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221965953@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <566F8799.1070305@pi.nu> <56AB933E.7000700@alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <56AC8259.9060907@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:28:57 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56AB933E.7000700@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/kxF3zT7RiSs2TksYq2gBVuh803k>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:29:14 -0000

Martin,

We do not disagree, the situation just now is (as different from when I
wrote the mail you responded to) that we have both discussion and
support on the mailing list.

In discussion with the authors we have converged on that they will
address the comments from Acee, and then I see the resolution of these
comments I will stat the wglc procedures.

This does not mean that anyone that have opinions or comments need to
wait for the wglc.

/Loa

On 2016-01-30 00:28, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Loa,
>
> although it is a fairly recent WG Document, it has gone through several
> revisions as an individual document and has been subject to external
> reviews.
>
> I believe you can start the WG LC, which is anyway a time during which
> reviews and comments are welcome/expected.
>
> -m
>
> Le 15/12/2015 04:23, Loa Andersson a écrit :
>>
>> Working Group and authors,
>>
>> <chair hat off>
>> As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
>> <chair hat on>
>> This draft has been a working group document since early August, but
>> there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
>>
>> There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
>> - there is total agreement on the draft
>> - there is no intrest in the draft
>>
>> I have no basis to decide which is the case.
>>
>> Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing
>> list if it is time to start the wglc.
>>
>> /Loa
>> mpls wg co-chair
>>
>> On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
>>> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>>>
>>> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft believe
>>> that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
>>> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as the
>>> next step.
>>>
>>>                  Regards,
>>>
>>>                                  Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls