Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt> (Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology) to Proposed Standard

Hello Taesik,

Thank you very much for reviewing the draft in detail
and for your valid comments.

We, the authors of the draft, will incorporate your comments.

Best regards, Huub.

---------
> Dear authors,
>
> I have two comments on this draft.
>
> 1) Section 4.4.1 (last two paragraphs above Figure 11)
>
> Following two sentences are duplicated in the last two paragraphs above Figure 11.
>
> Figure 11 shows the topology of single-node interconnected
> rings. Node C is the interconnection node between Ring1 and
> Ring2.
>
> Proposed change: delete the last paragraph.
>
>
> 2) Section 5.1.4.2 (3rd paragraph from the bottom)
>
> The last two bullet items correspond to conditions which trigger state transition from the Switching state to the Idle state. However, current text above those bullet items is describing adversely.
>
> Proposed change:
>
> OLD TEXT
> In one of the following conditions, transition from the Idle state to
> the Switching state MUST be triggered:
>
> NEW TEXT
> In one of the following conditions, transition from the Switching state to
> the Idle state MUST be triggered:
>
> Best regards,
> Taesik
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:00 AM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt> (Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology) to Proposed Standard
>
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
> (mpls) to consider the following document:
> - 'Shared-Ring protection (MSRP) mechanism for ring topology'
>    <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-05-12. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document describes requirements, architecture and solutions for
>     MPLS-TP Shared Ring Protection (MSRP) in a ring topology for point-
>     to-point (P2P) services.  The MSRP mechanism is described to meet the
>     ring protection requirements as described in RFC 5654.  This document
>     defines the Ring Protection Switch (RPS) Protocol that is used to
>     coordinate the protection behavior of the nodes on MPLS ring.
>
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection/ballot/
>
> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2680/
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2681/
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2682/
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2683/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...