IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid (was Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid)

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Fri, 16 August 2024 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCD6C14F71F; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzNkgd5mxW3e; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A791FC14F5FA; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 19:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4WlQFl6pzyz8R04B; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:01:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app08.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.206]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 47G214Jj046155; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:01:04 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:01:05 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:01:05 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb66beb2e1ffffffff9c4-f3a2a
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240816100105831EiuijDg3svSQGEirji726@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR19MB6501FFCAE3CDFD489DC0C467FCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: DS0PR19MB6501543F9BEAACDEA944610DFCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com,DS0PR19MB6501FFCAE3CDFD489DC0C467FCBF2@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: tsaad.net@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 47G214Jj046155
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 66BEB2EB.005/4WlQFl6pzyz8R04B
Message-ID-Hash: GXR3YNWR7SYXGPCX75KY2V3HQZUA3BMW
X-Message-ID-Hash: GXR3YNWR7SYXGPCX75KY2V3HQZUA3BMW
X-MailFrom: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid (was Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/lIvQv4arUk3NYY5kKOno_NV7w_g>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tarek, WG,

I have read the latest version and believe the content is clear and easy to guide implementation.

As a co-author, I support the progression of this draft to RFC.



Regards,
PSF



Original


From: TarekSaad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>;
Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年08月07日 01:13
Subject: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid (was Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid)



Hi WG,
 
I am correcting a mistake to reference to the WG adopted draft (as opposed to the individual draft for the same document). Sorry for the confusion.
 
Regards,
Tarek
 


From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>                                                      
 Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 9:53 AM
 To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>
 Cc: MPLS Working Chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org <draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid@ietf.org>
 Subject: Working Group Last Call on draft-xp-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid



Dear WG,
 
This email starts a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid.
 
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version, and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
 
Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
If necessary, comments may be sent unidirectional to the WG chairs.
 
Note, currently there are no IPR disclosures against this document. 
 
This poll runs until August 20, 2024.
 
Thank you,
Tarek (for the MPLS WG co-chairs)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status